首页> 外文OA文献 >Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
【2h】

Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas

机译:每周一次Exenatide与每日一次或两次胰岛素Detemir:单独使用二甲双胍或与磺脲类药物联合治疗的2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性的随机,开放标签临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVEdThis multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy andudsafety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2uddiabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas).udRESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSdPatients were randomized to EQW (2 mg) oruddetemir (once or twice daily, titrated to achieve fasting plasma glucose #5.5 mmol/L) for 26udweeks. The primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving A1C #7.0% and weight lossud$1.0 kg at end point, analyzed by means of logistic regression. Secondary outcomes includedudmeasures of glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and safety and tolerability.udRESULTSdOf 216 patients (intent-to-treat population), 111 received EQW and 105 receiveduddetemir. Overall, 44.1% (95% CI, 34.7–53.9) of EQW-treated patients compared with 11.4%ud(6.0–19.1) of detemir-treated patients achieved the primary outcome (P , 0.0001). Treatmentudwith EQW resulted in significantly greater reductions than detemir in A1C (least-square mean 6udSE, 21.30 6 0.08% vs. 20.88 6 0.08%; P , 0.0001) and weight (22.7 6 0.3 kg vs. +0.8 6 0.4udkg; P , 0.0001). Gastrointestinal-related and injection site–related adverse events occurred moreudfrequently with EQW than with detemir. There was no major hypoglycemia in either group. Fiveud(6%) patients in the EQW group and six (7%) patients in the detemir group experienced minorudhypoglycemia; only one event occurred without concomitant sulfonylureas (detemir group).udCONCLUSIONSdTreatment with EQW resulted in a significantly greater proportion ofudpatients achieving target A1C and weight loss than treatment with detemir, with a low risk ofudhypoglycemia. These results suggest that EQW is a viable alternative to insulin detemir treatmentudin patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using oral antidiabetes drugs.
机译:目的这项多中心,开放标签,平行臂研究比较了艾塞那肽每周一次(EQW)与滴定的胰岛素地特米治疗在二甲双胍控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性(有或没有磺脲类药物)。方法将d患者随机分为26个udweek(2毫克)或uddetemir(每天一次或两次,滴定以达到空腹血糖#5.5 mmol / L)。主要结局是通过逻辑回归分析得出的终点达到A1C#7.0%和体重减轻≥1.0kg的患者比例。次要结果包括对血糖控制,心血管危险因素以及安全性和耐受性的评估。 udRESULTSd在216例患者(意向性治疗人群)中,有111例接受了EQW,105例接受了 uddetemir。总体而言,接受EQW治疗的患者达到主要结果的比例为44.1%(95%CI,34.7-53.9),而接受detemir治疗的患者为11.4% ud(6.0-19.1)(P = 0.0001)。用EQW进行治疗后,A1C的减少幅度明显大于Detemir(最小二乘均数6 udSE,21.30 6 0.08%,对20.88 6 0.08%; P,0.0001)和体重(22.7 6 0.3 kg,对+0.8 6 0.4) udkg; P,0.0001)。与地特米尔相比,EQW胃肠道相关和注射部位相关的不良事件发生的频率更高。两组均无严重低血糖症。 EQW组有5名患者(6%),地特米尔组有6名患者(7%)有轻度低血糖症。 ud结论结论dEQW的治疗导致达到目标A1C和体重减轻的患者比使用detemir治疗的患者多得多,具有较低的 udp低血糖风险。这些结果表明,EQW是使用口服抗糖尿病药物进行血糖控制不充分的2型糖尿病胰岛素德米尔治疗的可行替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号