首页> 外文OA文献 >The rationale for energy efficiency policy: Assessing the recognition of the multiple benefits of energy efficiency retrofit policy
【2h】

The rationale for energy efficiency policy: Assessing the recognition of the multiple benefits of energy efficiency retrofit policy

机译:能效政策的基本原理:评估对能效改造政策的多重效益的认识

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The rationale for energy efficiency policy can be framed in terms of a variety of different benefits. This paper considers how different benefits have been used within the overall rationale for energy efficient retrofit policy in different contexts. We posit that different rationales may be used for the same policy response, and that the form of rationale used may affect the design, delivery or the level of policy support, with different rationales making it easier to account for different results. Considering retrofit policy in the contexts of the UK, Germany, New Zealand and Ireland, we characterise policy rationale in each case, assessing what the key perceived benefits have been, and whether they have changed over time. The analysis identifies some marked differences between cases with the recognition of benefits and the ensuing policy rationale resulting from a complex mix of political, social and economic influences. We find that recognition of multiple benefits may not equate with multiplied policy support, and instead it is more likely that different rationales will have relevance at different times, for different audiences. The findings highlight that, alongside evidence for policy, it is important to also consider how the overall rationale for policy is eventually framed.
机译:能源效率政策的基本原理可以根据各种不同的利益来界定。本文考虑了在不同情况下如何在节能改造政策的总体原理中使用不同的利益。我们认为,相同的策略响应可能使用不同的基本原理,并且所使用的基本原理形式可能会影响设计,交付或策略支持水平,而不同的基本原理则更容易说明不同的结果。考虑到英国,德国,新西兰和爱尔兰的环境中的改造政策,我们对每种情况下的政策依据进行了描述,评估了主要的感知收益是什么,以及它们是否随着时间而改变。该分析确定了在利益确认和随后的政治原理之间的显着差异,这些差异是由政治,社会和经济影响的复杂组合造成的。我们发现,对多重利益的认可可能并不等于多重的政策支持,相反,对于不同的受众,不同的理由更有可能在不同的时间具有相关性。调查结果突出表明,除了政策证据外,重要的是还要考虑如何最终制定政策的总体原理。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kerr N; Gouldson A; Barrett J;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号