首页> 外文OA文献 >Prosodic marking, pitch and intensity in spontaneous lexical self-repair in Dutch.
【2h】

Prosodic marking, pitch and intensity in spontaneous lexical self-repair in Dutch.

机译:荷兰语自发词汇自我修复中的韵律标记,音高和强度。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents results of a phonetic analysis of instances of lexical self-repair drawn from a corpus of spontaneous Dutch speech. The analysis addresses questions concerning the phonetic details of prosodic marking in self-repair and its conditioning factors. In particular, it examines the relevance of semantic, temporal and frequency-related factors in modelling f0 and intensity measures and auditory judgements of whether repairs are prosodically marked. It addresses the extent to which observations made in studies using experimentally-elicited speech can be expected to generalise to repairs drawn from uncontrolled spontaneous speech. The results suggest that prosodic marking is rare in spontaneous lexical self-repair, and that semantic, temporal and frequency factors play a limited role only in conditioning speakers' choices for or against prosodic marking, although several weak tendencies can be observed.
机译:本文提供了对自发自发荷兰语语料库的词汇自我修复实例进行语音分析的结果。该分析解决了有关自我修复中韵律标记的语音细节及其条件因素的问题。特别是,它检查了在建模f0和强度测量以及听觉判断中是否有维修标记的语义,时间和频率相关因素的相关性。它解决了使用实验诱发的语音进行的研究中的观察结果可以普遍推广到不受控制的自发性语音进行修复的程度。结果表明,韵律标记在自发的词汇自我修复中很少见,并且语义,时间和频率因素仅在限制说话者对韵律标记的选择或反对中起有限的作用,尽管可以观察到一些弱势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Plug L; Carter P;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号