首页> 外文OA文献 >The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS)
【2h】

The prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation in the era of acute revascularisation and statin therapy : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies - The Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS)

机译:心脏康复在急性血运重建和他汀类药物治疗时代的预后影响:随机和非随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析 - 心脏康复结果研究(CROs)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: The prognostic effect of multi-component cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the modern era of statins and acute revascularisation remains controversial. Focusing on actual clinical practice, the aim was to evaluate the effect of CR on total mortality and other clinical endpoints after an acute coronary event. DESIGN: Structured review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective controlled cohort studies (rCCSs) and prospective controlled cohort studies (pCCSs) evaluating patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or mixed populations with coronary artery disease (CAD) were included, provided the index event was in 1995 or later. RESULTS: Out of n = 18,534 abstracts, 25 studies were identified for final evaluation (RCT: n = 1; pCCS: n = 7; rCCS: n = 17), including n = 219,702 patients (after ACS: n = 46,338; after CABG: n = 14,583; mixed populations: n = 158,781; mean follow-up: 40 months). Heterogeneity in design, biometrical assessment of results and potential confounders was evident. CCSs evaluating ACS patients showed a significantly reduced mortality for CR participants (pCCS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.69; rCCS: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84; odds ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.48), but the single RCT fulfilling Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS) inclusion criteria showed neutral results. CR participation was also associated with reduced mortality after CABG (rCCS: HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.70) and in mixed CAD populations. CONCLUSIONS: CR participation after ACS and CABG is associated with reduced mortality even in the modern era of CAD treatment. However, the heterogeneity of study designs and CR programmes highlights the need for defining internationally accepted standards in CR delivery and scientific evaluation.
机译:背景:在他汀类药物和急性血运重建的现代时代,多成分心脏康复(CR)的预后效果仍然存在争议。着眼于实际临床实践,目的是评估急性冠脉事件后CR对总死亡率和其他临床终点的影响。设计:结构化审查和荟萃分析。方法:随机对照试验(RCT),回顾性对照队列研究(rCCSs)和前瞻性对照队列研究(pCCSs)评估急性冠脉综合征(ACS),冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)或冠心病混合人群(CAD)后的患者),前提是索引事件发生在1995年或更晚。结果:在n = 18,534的摘要中,有25项研究被鉴定为最终评估结果(RCT:n = 1; pCCS:n = 7; rCCS:n = 17),其中n = 219,702例(ACS后:n = 46,338; CABG:n = 14,583;混合人口:n = 158,781;平均随访时间:40个月。设计的异质性,结果的生物特征评估和潜在的混杂因素是显而易见的。 CCS评估ACS患者显示CR参与者的死亡率显着降低(pCCS:危险比(HR)0.37,95%置信区间(CI)0.20-0.69; rCCS:HR 0.64,95%CI 0.49-0.84;优势比0.20,95 %CI 0.08-0.48),但满足心脏康复结果研究(CROS)纳入标准的单个RCT显示中性结果。 CR参与还与CABG后(rCCS:HR 0.62,95%CI 0.54-0.70)和混合CAD人群的死亡率降低相关。结论:ACS和CABG术后CR的参与甚至可以降低死亡率,即使在现代CAD治疗时代也是如此。但是,研究设计和CR计划的异质性凸显了在CR交付和科学评估中需要定义国际认可的标准的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号