首页> 外文OA文献 >Quantitative strain analysis of the large deformation at the scale of microstructure: comparison between Digital Image Correlation and Microgrid techniques
【2h】

Quantitative strain analysis of the large deformation at the scale of microstructure: comparison between Digital Image Correlation and Microgrid techniques

机译:微观结构尺度变形的定量应变分析:数字图像相关与微网格技术的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A comparative study has been carried out to assess the accuracy of the Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique for the quantification of large strains in the microstructure of an Interstitial Free (IF) steel used in automotive applications. A microgrid technique has been used in this study in order to validate independently the strain measurements obtained with DIC. Microgrids with a pitch of 5 microns were printed on the etched microstructure of the IF steel to measure the local in-plane strain distribution during a tensile test carried out in a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The progressive deformation of the microstructure with microgrids has been recorded throughout the test as a sequence of micrographs and subsequently processed using DIC to quantify the distribution of local strain values. Strain maps obtained with the two techniques have been compared in order to assess the accuracy of the DIC measurements obtained using the natural patterns of the revealed microstructure in the SEM micrographs. The results obtained with the two techniques are qualitatively similar and thus, demonstrate the reliability of DIC applied to microstructures, even after large deformations in excess of 0.7. However, an average error of about 16 % was found in the strain values calculated using DIC.
机译:已经进行了一项比较研究,以评估用于汽车应用的无间隙(IF)钢的微观结构中大应变量化的数字图像相关(DIC)技术的准确性。为了独立验证用DIC获得的应变测量,本研究中使用了微电网技术。在IF钢的蚀刻微结构上印制间距为5微米的微网格,以测量在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)中进行的拉伸测试过程中的局部面内应变分布。在整个测试过程中,已记录了带有微格栅的微结构的渐进形变,作为一系列显微照片,随后使用DIC处理以量化局部应变值的分布。为了评估使用在SEM显微照片中显示的微观结构的自然模式获得的DIC测量的准确性,已比较了通过两种技术获得的应变图。两种技术获得的结果在质量上相似,因此,即使在超过0.7的大变形后,也证明了DIC应用于微结构的可靠性。但是,在使用DIC计算的应变值中发现平均误差约为16%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号