首页> 外文OA文献 >Relationships Among Shoreline Development, Nearshore Fish Communities, and Aquatic Macrophyte Communities in the Littoral Zone of Indiana Glacial Lakes
【2h】

Relationships Among Shoreline Development, Nearshore Fish Communities, and Aquatic Macrophyte Communities in the Littoral Zone of Indiana Glacial Lakes

机译:印第安纳州冰川湖滨海地区海岸线发育,近岸鱼类群落和水生植物群落的关系

摘要

The relationship among shoreline development, fish and aquatic plant communities was assessed in five glacial lakes in Indiana. Contrary to results reported in previous studies, vegetation abundance was significantly higher at sites along developed shorelines than along undeveloped shorelines. Vegetation abundance differed significantly among lakes, but was better explained by Secchi depths than by shoreline development. There was no consistent relationship between shoreline development and species richness of fishes and vegetation. This study suggests that shoreline development alone may not adequately explain vegetation and fish species richness and abundance.The usefulness of pop nets for sampling fishes and vegetation was assessed in the littoral zone of five glacial lakes in Indiana. Pop nets captured 11 species of fish not previously accounted for in surveys completed by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). Five of these fish species are considered intolerant by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and may be important for assessing the ecological integrity of lakes. Thirteen aquatic macrophyte species found in pop net samples were not previously accounted for in IDNR Tier II vegetation surveys, one of which is considered threatened in Indiana. Because of their ability to target littoral zone macrophytes and small-bodied littoral zone fish species pop nets may provide a supplemental tool to sample lakes more extensively than current practices.
机译:在印第安纳州的五个冰川湖中评估了海岸线发展,鱼类和水生植物群落之间的关系。与先前研究报告的结果相反,沿发达海岸线的站点的植被丰度明显高于未沿岸海岸线的站点。湖泊之间的植被丰度差异显着,但是用塞奇基深度比用海岸线发育更好地解释。海岸线发展与鱼类和植被物种丰富度之间没有一致的关系。这项研究表明,仅靠海岸线发展可能不足以解释植被和鱼类物种的丰富性和丰富性。在印第安纳州的五个冰河湖沿岸地区评估了流行网对鱼类和植被采样的有用性。流行网捕获了11种鱼类,这些鱼类以前在印第安纳州自然资源部(IDNR)完成的调查中未作说明。密歇根州自然资源部认为其中五种鱼类不耐病,对于评估湖泊的生态完整性可能很重要。在IDNR Tier II植被调查中,以前没有在流行网样本中发现13种水生植物物种,印第安纳州认为其中一种受到威胁。由于它们具有针对沿海地区大型植物和小规模沿海地区植物的能力,因此鱼类流行网可以提供一种补充工具,比目前的做法更广泛地对湖泊进行采样。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boatright Kelly D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号