首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring two methods of usability testing: concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols
【2h】

Exploring two methods of usability testing: concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols

机译:探索两种可用性测试方法:并发与回顾性思维 - 声音协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Think-aloud protocols are commonly used for the usability testing of instructional documents, Web sites and interfaces. This paper addresses the benefits and drawbacks of two think-aloud variations: the traditional concurrent think-aloud method and the less familiar retrospective think-aloud protocols. It also offers an outline of a long-term research project designed to empirically investigate the value of both variants. The results of a first comparative study indicate that, although the two methods have distinct differences, they do seem to produce a similar outcome. A more detailed description of the results will be offered during the presentation.
机译:思维协议通常用于指导文档,网站和界面的可用性测试。本文讨论了两种思维方式的优缺点:传统的并发思维方式和不太熟悉的回顾性思维方式协议。它还提供了一个长期研究项目的概述,该项目旨在通过经验研究这两种变体的价值。首次比较研究的结果表明,尽管这两种方法有明显的不同,但它们似乎确实产生了相似的结果。在演示过程中将提供对结果的更详细描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号