首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Eulerian hydrodynamic models with non-intrusive X-ray measurements in pressurized dense gas-fluidised beds
【2h】

Comparison of Eulerian hydrodynamic models with non-intrusive X-ray measurements in pressurized dense gas-fluidised beds

机译:欧拉流体动力学模型与加压致密气体流化床中非侵入式X射线测量的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of much fluidisation research has been the prediction of industrial beds, which are often large and operated at high pressure and temperature. This may be achieved through the use of Eulerian two-fluid models. Two such models have been compared with experimental results of the structure of a jet in a bubbling fluidised bed. In the first two-fluid model the particles are treated as a Newtonian fluid with a constant viscosity; in the second, kinetic theory for granular flow is used to describe the rheological properties of the particulate phase. The experiments were examined non-intrusively using X-ray equipment. The comparison of the experiments with the models revealed significant and systematic differences. These are described and the implications they have for the modelling and scaleup of bubbling fluidised beds are discussed.
机译:许多流化研究的目的是预测工业床,工业床通常很大,并且在高压和高温下运行。这可以通过使用欧拉二流体模型来实现。已经将两个这样的模型与在鼓泡流化床中的射流的结构的实验结果进行了比较。在第一个双流体模型中,将粒子视为具有恒定粘度的牛顿流体。在第二篇中,使用颗粒流动的动力学理论来描述颗粒相的流变性。使用X射线设备对实验进行了非侵入式检查。实验与模型的比较显示出显着和系统的差异。描述了这些内容,并讨论了它们对冒泡流化床建模和放大的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号