首页> 外文OA文献 >Energy Conservation in Existing Housing Sites; a Comparative Case Analysisudin the Netherlands
【2h】

Energy Conservation in Existing Housing Sites; a Comparative Case Analysisudin the Netherlands

机译:现有房屋用地的节约能源;比较案例分析 ud在荷兰

摘要

The housing sector in the Netherlands is responsible for a significant fraction of primary energy use and CO2 emissions. Great energy conservation opportunities are to be found in the existing housing stock, especially in large renovation projects on existing sites. Energy conservation savings of up to 90% are technically feasible. Despite this, there is little empirical evidence available about processes that influence the achievement of energy conservation goals in such locations. Moreover, no systematic, bottom-up research on the matter is available. This paper attempts to answer questions about the factors – size, direction and significance – that explain variation in the degree of energy conservation. Four main propositions were tested, comprising the following variables: actor characteristics, policy instruments, interorganizational collaboration and context. The study used a comparative research design. Data were collected from eleven existing housing sites where renovation projects had been executed, involving 70 personal interviews, a survey, and the collection of project documents. A mixed methods approach was applied for data analysis. The results show that interorganizational, collaborative efforts, policy instruments and the presence of wealthy housing associations have a positive influence on energy conservation outcomes. The mean energy conservation was slightly less than 40%, and outcomes varied between 26.5% and 69.8%. Strikingly, planning does not have a beneficial influence and the actual outcome is lower than predicted. The results are useful for national and local government policy makers, as they clearly argue that ambitious policy goals should be tempered.
机译:荷兰的住房部门负责一次能源的使用和二氧化碳的排放。在现有住房中,尤其是在现有场地的大型翻新工程中,将发现巨大的节能机会。节能高达90%在技术上是可行的。尽管如此,关于影响这些地区实现节能目标的过程的经验证据很少。而且,没有关于此问题的系统的,自下而上的研究。本文试图回答有关大小,方向和重要性等因素的问题,这些问题可以解释节能程度的变化。测试了四个主要命题,包括以下变量:参与者特征,政策工具,组织间合作和环境。该研究采用了比较研究设计。数据是从11个执行了翻新项目的房屋现场收集的,涉及70次个人访谈,调查和项目文件的收集。将混合方法方法应用于数据分析。结果表明,组织间的协作,政策手段以及富裕的住房协会的存在对节能成果具有积极影响。平均节能量略低于40%,结果在26.5%和69.8%之间变化。令人惊讶的是,计划没有产生有益的影响,实际结果低于预期。该结果对于国家和地方政府的决策者很有用,因为他们明确指出,应该降低雄心勃勃的政策目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号