首页> 外文OA文献 >City of Sydney Amendment Bills 2014 – the Borsak and Greenwich Bills
【2h】

City of Sydney Amendment Bills 2014 – the Borsak and Greenwich Bills

机译:2014年悉尼市修订法案 - Borsak和Greenwich法案

摘要

Discusses the implications of two Bills both dealing with voting in local government elections for the City of Sydney.OverviewOn 14 August 2014 two Private Members’ Bills were introduced in the NSW Parliament, both dealing with voting in local government elections for the City of Sydney, specifically as this relates to non-residents. One Bill, the City of Sydney Amendment (Elections) Bill 2014, sponsored by Robert Borsak of the Shooters and Fishers Party, was introduced in the Legislative Council; a second Bill, the City of Sydney Amendment (Business Voting and Council Elections) Bill 2014 , sponsored by the Independent member for Sydney, Alex Greenwich, was introduced in the Legislative Assembly. The first Bill will be referred to henceforth as the Borsak Bill ; the second as the Greenwich Bill .While the two Bills are concerned with broadly the same subject, their approach is markedly different, as is the substance of the legislation they propose . It is also the case that the Borsak Bill in particular has been the subject of extensive media comment, based on support or opposition for the proposal to extend the rights of the non-residential or the “business” vote in the City of Sydney .This proposal follows on from an inquiry by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters [the Committee report] into the 2012 Local Government Elections, the key recommendations of which are set out later in this paper; as are the findings of the October 2013 Local Government Acts Taskforce report, A New Local Government Act for New South Wales and Review of the City of Sydney Act 1988 [the Taskforce report].For City of Sydney elections, as for local government elections generally in NSW, electors include ratepayers who may reside outside the local government area. For local government elections generally, the relevant provisions are set out in the Local Government Act 1993, whereas a separate legislative sche me is in place for the City of Sydney. Under the Local Government Act 1993 (s 286), voting is not compulsory for those enrolled on the non-residential rolls; for the City of Sydney, on the other hand, voting is mandatory once enrolled.
机译:讨论两项涉及在悉尼市地方政府选举中投票的法案的含义.2014年8月14日,新南威尔士州议会提出了两项​​私人议员法案,这两项法案均涉及悉尼市地方政府选举的投票,特别是因为这与非居民有关。一项法案是由射击者和渔民党的罗伯特·博萨克(Robert Borsak)提出的《 2014年悉尼市修正案(选举)条例草案》在立法会中提出;在立法议会中,提出了第二项法案,即悉尼独立议员亚历克斯·格林威治(Alex Greenwich)提出的2014年悉尼市修正案(企业投票和议会选举)。此后第一项法案将称为“ Borsak法案”;第二个法案是《格林威治法案》。尽管这两个法案涉及的主题大致相同,但它们的做法却截然不同,因为它们提议的立法内容也是如此。在支持或反对扩大悉尼市非居民投票权或“商业”投票权的提议的支持下,尤其是Borsak法案也受到了广泛媒体的评论。选举事项联合常设委员会[委员会报告]对2012年地方政府选举进行的调查之后提出了该建议,其主要建议将在本文后面提出;以及2013年10月《地方政府法案特别工作组》报告,《新南威尔士州新地方政府法案》和《 1988年悉尼市法案》的审查结果[特别工作组报告]。对于悉尼市选举,通常与地方政府选举相同在新南威尔士州,选民包括可能居住在当地政府区域之外的纳税人。对于一般的地方政府选举,相关规定已在1993年《地方政府法》中规定,而悉尼市则另行制定了立法计划。根据1993年《地方政府法》(第286条),对于非住宅名册上的参选者,投票不是强制性的;另一方面,对于悉尼市而言,注册后必须进行投票。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gareth Griffith;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号