首页> 外文OA文献 >A scheme to address online copyright infringement
【2h】

A scheme to address online copyright infringement

机译:解决在线版权侵权的计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

 Over the past decade, the digital economy has enabled extraordinary technological innovation and evolution. The growth of the internet as a global distribution channel has also facilitated an explosion in the range and volume of content available online - from movies to music, books, software, games and much more.Australian consumersu27 ability to legally access this content in a timely and affordable manner does, however, vary significantly from sector to sector (eg; release of TV programs and movies in Australia can lag months behind US releases). This difficulty, combined with a proliferation of access technologies, such as file-sharing software, has reportedly seen a growth in the frequency of unauthorised access to online content and therefore copyright infringement.Content rights holders (described as u27Rights Holdersu27 in this paper) have lobbied for a number of strategies to address online copyright infringement, most recently focussing on a graduated response scheme designed to compel Australian Internet Intermediaries, (particularly Internet Service Providers), to forward notices and apply sanctions against users the Rights Holders allege are engaging in copyright infringement, via peer to peer (P2P) file sharing.The scheme sought by Rights Holders is without judicial or independent oversight and its purpose is to enforce a private property right that generates a royalty stream to Rights Holders. No similar scheme - compelling an intermediary to sanction an internet user on the allegation of a third party – exists.The Internet Service Providers (u27the ISPsu27) who are signatories to this paper are Telstra Bigpond, Optus, iiNet, iPrimus and Internode. The ISPs do not approve, condone or authorise any person engaging in copyright infringement by any means, including through the use of file sharing technologies. The majority of the ISPs in fact offer their customers legal content downloads and are therefore directly affected by copyright infringement in their own right.Over the past year, Communications Alliance and the ISPs have been engaged in constructive discussions with Rights Holders and the Australian Government in an attempt to identify a way to address online copyright infringement that is efficient, fair and cost-effective for all parties, including consumers. This paper outlines for discussion by all stakeholders a proposal to achieve that outcome.The proposal is for an expeditious and cost-effective 18 month u27notice and discoveryu27 trial. Importantly, the trial would be followed by an independent evaluation of its effectiveness, including whether the trial caused a demonstrable change in user behaviour and the relative costs, benefits and impacts of the trial to ISPs and Rights Holders. The evaluation would also be informed by the growing body of international experience in this area (eg: UK, NZ, Canada and France).The proposal is outlined at a high level and requires consultation with consumers and Government representatives, as well as Rights Holders and the broader ISP community, before its details can be finalised and an implementation timetable set.Image: 96dpi / flickr
机译:在过去的十年中,数字经济推动了非凡的技术创新和发展。互联网作为全球分销渠道的增长也促进了在线内容的范围和数量的爆炸式增长,从电影到音乐,书籍,软件,游戏等等,澳大利亚消费者能够合法地访问该内容。但是,及时且负担得起的方式确实因部门而异(例如,澳大利亚的电视节目和电影发行可能比美国发行晚几个月)。据报道,这种困难加上诸如文件共享软件之类的访问技术的泛滥,导致未经授权访问在线内容的频率增加,因此侵犯了版权。内容权利人(在本文档中称为 u27Rights Holders u27文件)游说了一些解决在线版权侵权的策略,最近的重点是旨在迫使澳大利亚互联网中介机构(尤其是互联网服务提供商)转发通知并对权利持有人指控的用户实施制裁的分级解决方案通过点对点(P2P)文件共享进行版权侵权。版权所有者所寻求的计划没有司法或独立监督,其目的是强制执行私有财产权,从而为权利持有者产生版税流。没有类似的方案-强迫中介人对第三方的指控进行制裁。签署本文的互联网服务提供商(Telstra Bigpond,Optus,iiNet,iPrimus和Internode)是本文的签署者。 。 ISP不以任何方式(包括使用文件共享技术)批准,纵容或授权任何从事版权侵权的人。实际上,大多数ISP都为其客户提供合法的内容下载,因此直接受到版权侵犯的直接影响。过去一年,Communication Alliance和ISP与权利持有人和澳大利亚政府进行了建设性讨论。试图找出一种解决在线版权侵权的方法,该方法对于包括消费者在内的所有各方都是有效,公平和具有成本效益的。本文概述了实现该结果的建议,以供所有利益相关者讨论。该建议是针对18个月的通知和发现试验的快速且具有成本效益的。重要的是,在审判之后将对其有效性进行独立评估,包括审判是否引起了用户行为的明显变化,以及审判对ISP和权利持有者的相对成本,收益和影响。该评估还将因该领域国际经验的不断增长(例如:英国,新西兰,加拿大和法国)而有所依据。该提案被概括性概述,需要与消费者,政府代表以及权利持有者进行协商。和更广泛的ISP社区,在可以确定其细节并确定实施时间表之前。图片:96dpi / flickr

著录项

  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号