首页> 外文OA文献 >Outcomes and Well-being Part 1: A comparative longitudinal study of two models of homecare delivery and their impact upon the older person self-reported subjective well-being
【2h】

Outcomes and Well-being Part 1: A comparative longitudinal study of two models of homecare delivery and their impact upon the older person self-reported subjective well-being

机译:结果和福祉第1部分:两种家庭护理服务模式的比较纵向研究及其对老年人自我报告的主观幸福感的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose – This paper aims to report on a study of outcome-focussed care for older people in one English local authority. The aim of the research is to examine whether altering the delivery of care to an outcome-focused model would improve the individual participant’s subjective well-being and save money for the local authority.udDesign/methodology/approach – In order for the aim of the research to be established, a pilot study was devised. This was a longitudinal study over 18 months, using a quantitative design. The sample was of 40 service users aged 65 and over whom all had critical and substantial care needs. Half of the sample of service users was receiving the new form of outcome-focused care and the other half were a comparison group who were receiving care packages according to the traditional form of delivery that could be characterised as a ‘‘task-focused’’ model. The service users were administered the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing Questionnaire (MYCAW). This questionnaire involves respondents identifying qualityof life issues;where they areseeking improvement; andmeasureschangeover time in relation to these.udFindings – The research established that there was a greater improvement in subjective well-being in the group receiving outcome-focussed care, when compared with the comparison group receiving the traditional task-focused model.udPractical implications – This paper will assist managers in their decision making to implement a more outcome-focused model of home care with older people.udOriginality/value – To use MYCAWin a social care context is an innovative aspect of this study as it has previously been used only in mainstream and complementary medicine. The focus of this paper is to examine the impact of two models of home care delivery for older people, and how these two models impact on the older persons’ self-reported well-being.
机译:目的–本文旨在报告在一个英国地方当局中对以结果为重点的老年人护理的研究情况。该研究的目的是研究将护理的提供改为以结果为中心的模型是否可以改善参与者的主观幸福感,并为地方政府节省资金。 udDesign / methodology / approach –为了实现要建立的研究,设计了一项初步研究。这是一项为期18个月的纵向研究,采用了定量设计。样本来自40位65岁以上的服务使用者,他们全部都具有关键和实质性的护理需求。服务用户样本中有一半正在接受以结果为中心的新护理形式,另一半是比较组,他们按照传统的交付方式(可能被描述为“以任务为中心”)接受护理套餐。模型。服务用户被管理了“衡量您自己的关注和健康问卷”(MYCAW)。该调查表包括受访者识别生活质量问题;他们在哪里寻求改善; udFindings –研究发现,与接受传统以任务为中心的对照组相比,接受以结果为中心的护理组的主观幸福感有较大改善。 –本文件将帮助管理人员做出决策,以实施更注重结果的老年人居家护理模型。 ud原创性/价值–使用MYCAWin的社会护理环境是该研究的一个创新方面,因为以前已经使用过仅在主流和辅助医学中。本文的重点是研究两种家庭护理模式对老年人的影响,以及这两种模式如何影响老年人的自我报告的幸福感。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gethin-Jones Stephen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号