首页> 外文OA文献 >An online survey using social media investigating the use of kinesiology type tape and McConnell type tape with clinicians who treat cycling related knee pain
【2h】

An online survey using social media investigating the use of kinesiology type tape and McConnell type tape with clinicians who treat cycling related knee pain

机译:一项在线调查,使用社交媒体调查使用运动机能学类型磁带和mcConnell型胶带与临床医生治疗骑车相关的膝关节疼痛

摘要

Background: The Tour de France will undoubtedly showcase various cycling related injuries in its Yorkshire opening stages in 2014. Patello-Femoral Pain (PFP) is responsible for over 25% of all road cycling injuries and over 65% of injuries in the lower limb (Callaghan, 2005: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 9, 226-236). Alongside trauma related pain it remains the main injury affecting experienced and elite cyclists and is commonly treated using taping (broadly categorised into McConnell and kinesiology type tape - KTT). To date it is unknown as to the extent and rationale behind the use of tape in cycling related knee pain.ududPurpose: To determine clinicians’ current use of taping in elite and experienced cyclists with cycling related knee pain in order to inform a 3D motion analysis study into current taping techniques. To date very little work has been undertaken in this area and although it is presumed that taping is used extensively throughout cycling, it is unknown as to how much it is actually used and the rationale behind its use. ududMethods: An online survey (Survey Monkey™) determined current taping techniques used by clinicians treating elite and experienced cyclists. A preferred taping application was determined and reported from a choice of 4 (fig 1). Data were collected from clinicians (n=30), identified as having an area of special clinical interest in cycling related knee pain within the target group. Recruitment was predominantly through the social network Twitter™. Data collected included; treatment methods, clinical taping usage, specific applications, perceived effectiveness of treatment, clinical rationale, formal training, clinical importance and outcome measures. ududResults: The data collected indicated a clear preference from clinicians for the use of KTT (figure 2) at >80%. 59% of clinicians used taping to manage pain, 46% for re-aligning patella, and 29% for activation of musculature, (figure 3). Clinicians preferred to initially apply tape, then test in-situ before re-applying (74%) and adapt to each cyclist (87%) - (figure 4). Reported outcome objectives were predominately pain management and biomechanical changes. When asked to score the effects of clinical taping, participants felt that pain; biomechanical changes and proprioception were effective to ‘some degree’ (figure 5). Proprioception was considered very influential by over 50% (figure 5). Reasons for use that scored highly were clinical effectiveness, ease of use and longevity (figure 6). Rating of efficacy and effectiveness scored high in ‘success of outcome’, ‘repeatability & reliability’, and ‘comfort’ (figure 7). >50% felt that placebo had some effect (figure 5).ududDiscussion: KTT is clearly the tape of choice in cycling today. This is in contrast to the use of McConnell type tape in traditional physical therapy setting. There was considerable variability in clinician’s reasoning for taping use, reflecting gaps in the current knowledge base. Its clinical adaptation usage is in line with previous work by McConnell even though its longevity and comfort appears to separate its practice in cycling. The reported perception of placebo effect from KTT tape is an intriguing adjunct to the findings and should be considered in future research designs for effectiveness using this type of tape. This (placebo effect) was specified as a separate effect from that of proprioception however, which scored highly as a clinical effect. Notably, proprioception in cycling has not been effectively measured to date. Interestingly, clinicians felt it was an effect to some degree (fig 5) whilst also scoring it as not at all important clinically (Figure 7). The use of social media to recruit participants establishes a new and innovative approach to recruitment. This can be seen as timely due to its prevalence in today’s society and increased use amongst clinicians globally for both networking and evidence based practice debate and knowledge transfer.ududConclusions. KTT appears the preferred application in cycling related knee pain. The data provide a clear rationale for the testing of specific taping techniques and indicate how clinicians are currently using taping in the treatment of cycling related knee pain. These results give a clear focus for a follow up study, which would aim to determine the biomechanical efficacy and clinical effectiveness of KTT. This work would determine any biomechanical changes in the PFJ during cycling as well as looking at any effects from neutral and no tape. In addition, a focus on pain and placebo would be interesting outcome measures of future work.
机译:背景:环法自行车赛无疑将在2014年约克郡公开赛期间展示各种与自行车相关的伤害。帕特洛-女性疼痛(PFP)占所有公路自行车伤害的25%以上,下肢的伤害超过65%(卡拉汉,2005年:《身体运动疗法杂志》,第9卷,第226-236页)。除了与创伤有关的疼痛外,它仍然是影响有经验的自行车骑行者和精英骑自行车者的主要伤害,通常使用绑带(大致分为McConnell和运动学类型的胶带-KTT)进行治疗。迄今为止,在自行车相关的膝关节疼痛中使用胶带的程度和原理尚不清楚。 ud ud目的:确定临床医生目前在与自行车相关的膝关节疼痛的精英和有经验的自行车手中使用绑带的方法,以告知3D运动分析研究了当前的录音技术。迄今为止,在这一领域几乎没有开展任何工作,尽管假定在整个循环过程中都广泛使用了编带,但尚不清楚其实际使用量及其使用的原理。方法:一项在线调查(Survey Monkey™)确定了临床医生治疗精英和经验丰富的自行车手的当前编带技术。确定了首选的编带应用,并从4种选择中进行报告(图1)。从临床医生(n = 30)收集数据,这些数据被确定为目标人群中与自行车相关的膝关节疼痛具有特殊临床意义的领域。招聘主要通过社交网络Twitter™进行。收集的数据包括在内;治疗方法,临床编带用法,特定应用,感知的治疗效果,临床原理,正式培训,临床重要性和结果指标。 ud ud结果:收集到的数据表明,临床医生明确倾向于> 80%的使用KTT(图2)。 59%的临床医生使用包扎来控制疼痛,46%的患者用于骨复位,29%的患者用于激活肌肉组织(图3)。临床医生更喜欢先贴胶带,然后再现场测试再贴胶带(74%),并适应每个骑自行车的人(87%)-(图4)。报告的结果目标主要是疼痛处理和生物力学变化。当要求对临床录音的效果进行评分时,参与者感到疼痛。生物力学变化和本体感受在一定程度上有效(图5)。本体感受被认为有很大的影响,超过50%(图5)。得分高的原因是临床有效性,易用性和寿命(图6)。在“结果成功”,“可重复性和可靠性”和“舒适性”方面,疗效和有效性的评分较高(图7)。 > 50%的人认为安慰剂有一定作用(图5)。 ud ud讨论:显然,KTT是当今自行车运动中的首选胶带。这与传统物理治疗环境中使用McConnell型胶带相反。临床医生对录音使用的推理存在很大差异,反映了当前知识库中的空白。它的临床适应性用法与McConnell先前的工作相符,尽管其长寿和舒适性似乎将其骑行实践与众不同。据报道,KTT胶带对安慰剂作用的感知是发现的有趣补充,应在以后的研究设计中考虑使用这种胶带的有效性。这种(安慰剂作用)被指定为与本体感受的独立作用,但本体感受在临床上得分很高。值得注意的是,迄今为止,尚未有效地测量自行车中的本体感受。有趣的是,临床医生认为这种作用在某种程度上是有效的(图5),同时也对它的临床评价并不重要(图7)。利用社交媒体招募参与者建立了一种新颖的招募方式。由于它在当今社会中很普遍,并且在全球临床医生中越来越多地用于网络和基于证据的实践辩论以及知识转移,因此这可以被认为是及时的。 ud ud结论。 KTT似乎是骑行相关的膝盖疼痛的首选应用。数据为测试特定的绑扎技术提供了明确的理由,并指出了临床医生目前如何使用绑扎来治疗与自行车相关的膝盖疼痛。这些结果为后续研究提供了明确的重点,该研究旨在确定KTT的生物力学功效和临床功效。这项工作将确定PFJ在骑行过程中的任何生物力学变化,以及观察中性和无胶带的影响。另外,关注疼痛和安慰剂将是未来工作的有趣结果指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号