首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing two-phase locking and optimistic concurrency control protocols in multiprocessor real-time databases
【2h】

Comparing two-phase locking and optimistic concurrency control protocols in multiprocessor real-time databases

机译:比较多处理器实时数据库中的两阶段锁定和乐观并发控制协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous studies (Haritsa et al., 1990) have shown that optimistic concurrency control (OCC) generally performs better than lock-based protocols in disk-based real-time database systems (RTDBS). We compare the two concurrency control protocols in both disk-based and memory-resident multiprocessor RTDBS. Based on their performance characteristics, a new lock-based protocol, called two phase locking-lock write all (2PL-LW), is proposed. The results of our performance evaluation experiments show that different characteristics of the two environments indeed have great impact on the protocols' performance. We identify such system characteristics and show that our new lock-based protocols, 2PL-LW, is better than OCC in meeting transaction deadlines in both disk-based and memory-resident RTDBS.
机译:先前的研究(Haritsa等,1990)表明,在基于磁盘的实时数据库系统(RTDBS)中,乐观并发控制(OCC)的性能通常优于基于锁的协议。我们比较了基于磁盘和驻留内存的多处理器RTDBS中的两种并发控制协议。基于它们的性能特征,提出了一种新的基于锁的协议,称为两阶段锁-全部写锁(2PL-LW)。我们的性能评估实验的结果表明,两种环境的不同特性确实会对协议的性能产生很大的影响。我们确定了此类系统特征,并表明我们新的基于锁的协议2PL-LW在满足基于磁盘的RTDBS和驻留内存的RTDBS中的交易截止日期方面比OCC更好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kao CM; Chiu A; Lam KY;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号