首页> 外文OA文献 >Google Book Search, Transformative Use and Commercial Intermediation: An Economic Perspective
【2h】

Google Book Search, Transformative Use and Commercial Intermediation: An Economic Perspective

机译:谷歌图书搜索,转型使用和商业中介:经济视角

摘要

This Article examines two important features of many copyright fair use cases: transformative use and commercial intermediation. While the issue of transformative use has arisen in many fair use cases, there is a lack of consistency and clear guidance on the meaning of “transformativeness” and how the degree of transformativeness is to be assessed. Additionally, in analyzing commercial use, courts have largely failed to appreciate the distinctive role played by “commercial intermediaries” in facilitating socially beneficial uses of copyrighted works. This Article advances economically grounded proposals for improving the way in which courts analyze transformative use and commercial intermediation. First, courts should focus on the economic effects of transformation instead of employing a purely conceptual analysis. In particular, courts should ascertain any complementary or substitutive effects as well as the cost and innovative-efficiency implications of the use: the more transformative the use, the more it tends to minimize market harm to the copyright owner and maximize social benefits such as transaction-cost economies and follow-on innovation. Second, courts should view commercial intermediaries favorably insofar as they facilitate educational or other beneficial fair uses of copyrighted works through cost-efficient production or substantial innovative investments. In other words, courts should view the commercial use in context and recognize that commercial uses may nonetheless produce social benefits that substantially outweigh any harm caused to copyright owners. This Article uses the 2013 Google Books decision as a primary case study, supplemented by related cases from the United States and abroad, to illustrate these arguments, concluding that the court’s decision to uphold Google’s fair use defense for Google Books is well-supported by the complementary relationship between Google Books and copyrighted books, Google’s substantial investments in promoting productive uses of books through Google Books, and transaction-cost and innovative-incentive considerations.
机译:本文研究了许多版权合理使用案例的两个重要特征:转换使用和商业中介。尽管在许多合理使用案例中都出现了转换使用的问题,但对于“转换性”的含义以及如何评估转换性的程度,缺乏一致性和明确的指导。此外,在分析商业使用时,法院在很大程度上没有意识到“商业中介人”在促进版权作品在社会上的有益使用方面所发挥的独特作用。本文提出了具有经济基础的建议,以改善法院分析变革性使用和商业中介的方式。首先,法院应将重点放在转型的经济影响上,而不是采用纯粹的概念分析。特别是,法院应确定使用的任何补充或替代效果以及使用的成本和创新效率:使用越具有变革性,它就越倾向于使对版权拥有者的市场损害最小化并最大化诸如交易之类的社会利益。成本经济和后续创新。第二,法院应通过具有成本效益的生产或大量创新投资,促进商业上受版权保护的作品的教育或其他有益的合理使用,对商业中介机构应给予有利的对待。换句话说,法院应在上下文中审视商业用途,并认识到商业用途仍然可以产生远远超过对版权拥有者造成的任何损害的社会利益。本文将2013年Google图书的判决作为主要案例研究,并以美国和国外的相关案例为补充,以说明这些论点,并得出结论认为,法院维持Google对Google图书的合理使用辩护的判决得到了法院的充分支持。 Google图书与受版权保护的图书之间的互补关系,Google在通过Google图书促进图书的生产性使用方面的大量投资,以及交易成本和创新激励因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kwok KHF;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号