首页> 外文OA文献 >The limitations of ritual propriety: Ritual and language in Xunzi and Zhuangzi
【2h】

The limitations of ritual propriety: Ritual and language in Xunzi and Zhuangzi

机译:仪式礼仪的局限性:荀子和庄子的仪式和语言

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This essay examines the theory of ritual propriety presented in the Xúnzǐ and criticisms of Xunzi-like views found in the classical Daoist anthology Zhuāngzǐ. To highlight the respects in which the Zhuāngzǐ can be read as posing a critical response to a Xunzian view of ritual propriety, the essay juxtaposes the two texts' views of language, since Xunzi's theory of ritual propriety is intertwined with his theory of language. I argue that a Zhuangist critique of the presuppositions of Xunzi's stance on language also undermines his stance on ritual propriety. Xunzi contends that state promulgation of anelaborate code of ritual propriety is a key to good social order (zhi) and that state regulation of language is a key to smooth communication and thus also good order. The Zhuāngzǐ provides grounds for doubting both contentions. Claiming that ritual propriety causally produces social order is analogous to claiming that grammar causally produces smooth linguistic communication, when in fact it is more likely our ability to communicate that allows us to develop shared rules of grammar. Humans have fundamental social and communicative capacities that undergird our abilities to speak a language or engage in shared ritual performances. It is these more fundamental capacities, not their manifestation in a particular system of grammar or ritual norms, that provide the root explanation of our ability to communicate or to live together harmoniously. The Xunzi-Zhuangzi dialectic suggests that ritual is indispensable, but normatively justified rituals will be less rigid, less comprehensive, less fastidious, and more spontaneous than a Xunzian theorist would allow. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012.
机译:本文考察了Xúnzǐ提出的礼仪理论,以及对古典道教选本《ZhangZangzǐ》中类似X子的观点的批评。为了强调the子可以被理解为对a子的礼仪观点的批判性回应的方面,本文将两种文本的语言观点并列,因为inter子的礼仪理论与他的语言理论是交织在一起的。我认为,对ist子的语言立场的预设进行的壮族批评也会破坏他对礼仪性的立场。 un子认为,国家颁布详尽的礼仪守则是维持良好社会秩序的关键(zhi),而国家对语言的规范则是畅通沟通和维持良好秩序的关键。 《庄子》为质疑这两种观点提供了依据。主张礼仪有因果关系会产生社会秩序,这类似于声称语法有因果关系会产生顺畅的语言交流,而事实上,更可能是我们的交流能力使我们能够制定共同的语法规则。人类具有基本的社交和交流能力,这削弱了我们说一种语言或参加共同的仪式表演的能力。这些更基本的能力,而不是它们在特定的语法或仪式规范体系中的体现,才是我们交流或和谐生活的能力的根本解释。 un子-庄子辩证法表明,仪式是必不可少的,但规范合理的仪式将比Xu子理论家所允许的更少僵化,不全面,不那么讲究,更自发。 ©Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2012。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fraser C;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:03:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号