首页> 外文OA文献 >Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals
【2h】

Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals

机译:指导是否重要?一个多学科的荟萃分析,比较辅导和非辅导个体

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study of mentoring has generally been conducted within disciplinary silos with a specific type of mentoring relationship as a focus. The purpose of this article is to quantitatively review the three major areas of mentoring research (youth, academic, workplace) to determine the overall effect size associated with mentoring outcomes for protégés. We also explored whether the relationship between mentoring and protégé outcomes varied by the type of mentoring relationship (youth, academic, workplace). Results demonstrate that mentoring is associated with a wide range of favorable behavioral, attitudinal, health-related, relational, motivational, and career outcomes, although the effect size is generally small. Some differences were also found across type of mentoring. Generally, larger effect sizes were detected for academic and workplace mentoring compared to youth mentoring. Implications for future research, theory, and applied practice are provided. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:指导研究一般是在学科孤岛内进行的,重点是特定类型的指导关系。本文的目的是对辅导研究的三个主要领域(青年,学术,工作场所)进行定量审查,以确定与门诊辅导成果相关的总体效果大小。我们还探讨了指导与门生之间的关系是否因指导关系的类型(青年,学术,工作场所)而有所不同。结果表明,尽管效果规模通常很小,但指导与各种有利的行为,态度,健康相关,关系,动机和职业结局有关。在指导类型上也发现了一些差异。通常,与青年辅导相比,学术和工作场所辅导的效果更大。提供了对未来研究,理论和应用实践的启示。 ©2007 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号