首页> 外文OA文献 >Portability, salary and asset price risk: A continuous-time expected utility comparison of DB and DC pension plans
【2h】

Portability, salary and asset price risk: A continuous-time expected utility comparison of DB and DC pension plans

机译:可携带性,工资和资产价格风险:DB和DC养老金计划的连续时间预期效用比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper compares two different types of private retirement plans from the perspective of a representative beneficiary: a defined benefit (DB) and a defined contribution (DC) plan. While salary risk is the main common risk factor in DB and DC pension plans, one of the key differences is that DB plans carry portability risks, whereas DC plans bear asset price risk. We model these tradeoffs explicitly in this paper and compare these two plans in a utility-based framework. Our numerical analysis focuses on answering the question of when the beneficiary is indifferent between the DB and DC plan. Most of our results confirm the findings in the existing literature, among which, e.g., portability losses considerably reduce the relative attractiveness of the DB plan. However, we also find that the attractiveness of the DB plan can decrease in the level of risk aversion, which is inconsistent with the existing literature.
机译:本文从代表受益人的角度比较了两种不同类型的私人退休计划:定额给付(DB)计划和定额给付(DC)计划。工资风险是DB和DC养老金计划中的主要常见风险因素,但主要区别之一是DB计划具有可移植性风险,而DC计划则承担资产价格风险。我们在本文中明确地对这些折衷进行建模,并在基于实用程序的框架中比较这两个计划。我们的数值分析着重于回答DB和DC计划的受益人何时无所谓的问题。我们的大多数结果证实了现有文献中的发现,例如,可移植性损失大大降低了DB计划的相对吸引力。但是,我们还发现数据库计划的吸引力可能会降低风险规避的水平,这与现有文献不一致。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chen An; Uzelac Filip;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号