首页> 外文OA文献 >Do policies for phasing out fossil fuel subsidies deliver what they promise? Social gains and repercussions in Iran, Indonesia and Ghana
【2h】

Do policies for phasing out fossil fuel subsidies deliver what they promise? Social gains and repercussions in Iran, Indonesia and Ghana

机译:逐步取消化石燃料补贴的政策是否能实现他们的承诺?伊朗,印度尼西亚和加纳的社会收益和影响

摘要

Fossil fuel subsidies reform has been intensively debated and promoted as a concrete step towards sustainable development, with anticipated benefits of reduced carbon emissions, saved public spending, and improved social distribution. But does this "triple-win" policy deliver what it promises? This working paper focuses on the social "win" - the narrative of social and distributional gains of the energy subsidies reform. The research follows a comparative analysis approach. Three countries were selected as target for in-depth case studies based on their diverse political, economic and social contexts: Ghana, Indonesia and Iran. We examine in each case the distributional effects of subsidy removal, the design and implementation of social programmes and their impact on welfare, as well as the political economy around sustainability of the reform. Based on comparative studies across the three cases, a set of political, economic and social factors are identified to have key impact on the social outcome of reforms. The key conclusions are as follows. There is no quick fix for social "win". Instead, the social outcome is influenced by a set of political, economic and social factors at different levels. Governments need to put the energy subsidies reform in the bigger context and manage the complex mix of influencing factors, to anchor the policy on a broad coalition of interests. Long-term political commitment to subsidies reform is key. A clearly communicated commitment would help win trust from the public in energy subsidies reforms and support for the government to implement relevant policies. A long-term and gradual reform strategy which takes into account both immediate cushion and long-term distributional effects is essential to achieving social gains. Social gain needs to have a prominent role in energy subsidy reforms. The three case studies indicate a clear dynamic between social gains and subsidy reform processes. Thorough analysis using a social lens approach can identify important factors to be taken into account for reform policies to be sustained and more importantly, deliver a social win. Rather than to be taken as a given, a social win from fossil fuel subsidy reforms requires the social dimension to be a central part of the reform policy.
机译:作为实现可持续发展的具体步骤,对化石燃料补贴改革进行了激烈的辩论和促进,其预期的好处是减少了碳排放,节省了公共开支并改善了社会分配。但是,这种“三赢”政策能否兑现其承诺?本工作文件侧重于社会“赢”-能源补贴改革的社会和分配收益的叙述。该研究遵循比较分析方法。根据三个国家的不同政治,经济和社会背景,选择了三个国家作为深入案例研究的目标:加纳,印度尼西亚和伊朗。我们分别研究了取消补贴的分配效应,社会计划的设计和实施及其对福利的影响,以及围绕改革可持续性的政治经济学。根据对这三个案例的比较研究,确定了一系列政治,经济和社会因素,这些因素对改革的社会成果具有关键影响。主要结论如下。没有社会“胜利”的快速解决方案。相反,社会结果受到不同级别的一系列政治,经济和社会因素的影响。政府需要将能源补贴改革放在更大的范围内,并管理各种影响因素的复杂组合,以使该政策以广泛的利益联盟为基础。对补贴改革的长期政治承诺是关键。明确传达的承诺将有助于赢得公众对能源补贴改革的信任,并支持政府实施相关政策。既要考虑立即缓冲又要考虑长期分配影响的长期渐进改革战略,对于实现社会利益至关重要。社会收益需要在能源补贴改革中发挥重要作用。这三个案例研究表明,社会收益与补贴改革过程之间存在明显的动态关系。使用社会视角的方法进行全面分析可以确定要坚持的改革政策应考虑的重要因素,更重要的是要取得社会胜利。化石燃料补贴改革要获得社会胜利,而不是被认为是必须的,而是需要社会层面成为改革政策的核心部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号