首页> 外文OA文献 >Does Federally-Funded Job Training Work? Non-experimental Estimates of WIA Training Impacts Using Longitudinal Data on Workers and Firms
【2h】

Does Federally-Funded Job Training Work? Non-experimental Estimates of WIA Training Impacts Using Longitudinal Data on Workers and Firms

机译:联邦资助的职业培训是否有效?使用纵向数据对工人和企业进行WIa培训影响的非实验性估计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We study the job training provided under the US Workforce Investment Act (WIA) to adults and dislocated workers in two states. Our substantive contributions center on impacts estimated non-experimentally using administrative data. These impacts compare WIA participants who do and do not receive training. In addition to the usual impacts on earnings and employment, we link our state data to the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) data at the US Census Bureau, which allows us to estimate impacts on the characteristics of the firms at which participants find employment. We find moderate positive impacts on employment, earnings and desirable firm characteristics for adults, but not for dislocated workers. Our primary methodological contribution consists of assessing the value of the additional conditioning information provided by the LEHD relative to the data available in state Unemployment Insurance (UI) earnings records. We find that value to be zero.
机译:我们研究了根据《美国劳动力投资法》(WIA)向两个州的成年人和流离失所工人提供的职业培训。我们的实质性贡献集中于使用行政数据以非实验方式估算的影响。这些影响比较了接受和未接受培训的WIA参与者。除了对收入和就业的通常影响之外,我们还将州数据与美国人口普查局的纵向雇主-家庭动态数据(LEHD)关联起来,这使我们能够估计对参与者找到工作的公司特征的影响。我们发现对成年人,而不是对下岗工人的就业,收入和理想的公司特征产生适度的积极影响。我们的主要方法论贡献在于,相对于州失业保险(UI)收入记录中可用的数据,评估LEHD提供的其他条件信息的价值。我们发现该值为零。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号