首页> 外文OA文献 >Getting Older, Getting Poorer? A Study of the Earnings, Pensions, Assets and Living Arrangements of Older People in Nine Countries
【2h】

Getting Older, Getting Poorer? A Study of the Earnings, Pensions, Assets and Living Arrangements of Older People in Nine Countries

机译:变老,变得更穷?九国老年人的收入,养老金,资产和生活安排研究

摘要

Aging involves not one but several transitions. People move from working to not working, from relying upon labor income to relying on transfers. They also tend to live in smaller households, not only because any children will have moved away but also because, at some stage, a spouse dies. People move homes and sometimes they move back to live with their now grown-up children. This paper examines the wellbeing of people as they pass through the later stages of their life and through different labor market statuses and domestic statuses. It examines and compares nine countries - Canada, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. It draws particularly from a special analysis of micro-data sets that report on incomes, but it complements this with an analysis of data on wealth, on consumption, on housing and on the use of in-kind services provided by the state. The paper is original in more than one way. First, its analysis is based upon the individual rather than the household. This means both that the importance of own-income sources can be evaluated and that intrafamilial transfers are observed. Second, it includes Japan, a country where both employment patterns and living patterns for older people are substantially different to those of many other OECD countries. Many more work, and many more live in multigenerational households. Principal findings are that, although income does fall with age, people over retirement age are not substantially less well off than people of working age. The difference is further reduced when the absence of work-related expenses and older people's generally lower housing expenses are taken into account. Remarkably, and regardless of the public-private mix of pensions and the importance or otherwise of work, the income of retirement-age people, relative to that of working-age people, is rather similar across all nine countries. Nevertheless, some older people, particularly old single women, fare less well, and this is the case in all nine countries. Widowhood reduces wellbeing, particularly because in many countries all or part of the husband's pension is lost, but also because single people do not enjoy the scale economies enjoyed by couple households. Those old single people who move back with their adult relatives tend to fare much better than those who stay living alone. Consumption of in-kind services provided by the state, such as social care and especially of health care services, can substantially enhance the income of the oldest of the old. This needs to be taken into account when relative wellbeing is assessed. The extent to which such services are provided cost-free makes comparisons between countries as different as the United States and Sweden quite fraught. Analysis such as was carried out here on a one-off basis needs to be repeated to monitor changes in wellbeing in old age. This is important because pension policy is being changed. Older people are being encouraged to work longer and private rather than public provision is being promoted.
机译:老龄化不仅涉及一个过渡,而且涉及几个过渡。人们从工作变成不工作,从依靠劳动收入转向依靠转移支付。他们还倾向于生活在较小的家庭中,这不仅是因为任何孩子都会流离失所,而且还因为在某个阶段配偶去世。人们搬家,有时他们搬回与现在已成年的孩子同住。本文考察了人们在生活的后期阶段以及通过不同的劳动力市场状况和家庭状况获得的幸福。它检查并比较了九个国家-加拿大,芬兰,德国,意大利,日本,荷兰,瑞典,英国和美国。它特别是从对收入报告的微观数据集的特殊分析中获得的,但是它通过对财富,消费,住房和国家提供的实物服务的使用数据的分析来补充。纸张有多种原始形式。首先,它的分析是基于个人而不是家庭。这意味着既可以评估自己收入来源的重要性,又可以观察到家庭内部的转移。其次,它包括日本,日本这个国家的老年人的就业方式和生活方式与许多其他经合组织国家都大不相同。更多的工作,还有更多的人居住在多代家庭中。主要发现是,尽管收入确实会随着年龄的增长而下降,但退休年龄以上的人的富裕程度并没有比工作年龄的人低很多。如果考虑到没有与工作相关的支出以及老年人的住房费用普遍较低,这种差异会进一步减少。值得注意的是,无论养老金的公私合营以及工作的重要性与否,在所有九个国家中,相对于工作年龄的人而言,退休年龄的人的收入都相当相似。但是,有些老年人,特别是老年单身女性的情况不太好,这在所有九个国家都是如此。丧偶降低了人们的福祉,特别是因为在许多国家,丈夫的养老金全部或部分损失了,而且单身人士无法享受夫妻家庭享有的规模经济。与成年亲戚一起搬回的那些单身老人比那些独自一人住的人的票价要好得多。国家提供的实物服务的消费,例如社会护理,尤其是医疗服务的消费,可以大大增加老年人的收入。在评估相对健康时,必须考虑到这一点。提供免费服务的程度使美国和瑞典等不同国家之间的比较充满争议。这里需要进行一次一次性的分析,以监测老年人的幸福感变化。这很重要,因为养老金政策正在改变。鼓励老年人工作更长的时间,并提倡私人而非公共服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号