首页> 外文OA文献 >Precision-guided or blunt? The effects of US economic sanctions on human rights
【2h】

Precision-guided or blunt? The effects of US economic sanctions on human rights

机译:精确导向还是钝?美国经济制裁对人权的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We use endogenous treatment-regression models to estimate the causal average treatment effect of US economic sanctions on four types of human rights. In contrast to previous studies, we find no support for adverse effects of sanctions on economic rights, political and civil rights, and basic human rights. With respect to women's rights, our findings even indicate a positive relationship. Emancipatory rights are, on average, strengthened when a country faces sanctions by the US. Our findings are robust when applying various changes to the empirical specification. Most importantly, this study provides strong evidence that the endogeneity of treatment assignment must be modelled when the consequences of sanctions are studied empirically.
机译:我们使用内生的待遇回归模型来估计美国经济制裁对四种人权的因果平均待遇效果。与以往的研究相比,我们发现制裁对经济权利,政治和公民权利以及基本人权的不利影响没有得到支持。关于妇女权利,我们的调查结果甚至表明存在积极关系。当一个国家面临美国的制裁时,平均而言,其解放权利会得到加强。当对经验性规范进行各种更改时,我们的发现是可靠的。最重要的是,这项研究提供了有力的证据,当对制裁的后果进行实证研究时,必须对治疗分配的内生性进行建模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号