首页> 外文OA文献 >Should local public employment services be merged with local social benefit administrations?
【2h】

Should local public employment services be merged with local social benefit administrations?

机译:当地公共就业服务是否应与当地社会福利管理部门合并?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The German Federal government has allowed local governments of some regions (Approved Local Providers) to be solely responsible for the care of unemployment benefit II recipients. In the remaining regions Joint Local Agencies were formed, where the local social benefit administrations work together with the local public employment services. We find that despite positive self-selection Approved Local Providers do not perform better than Joint Local Agencies. Even more interestingly, using a unique data set on organisational characteristics we are able to show that the organisational features implemented primarily by Approved Local Providers are positively correlated with the job finding probability of the unemployment benefits II recipients. Thus, local governments that self-selected into Approved Local Providers seem to have implemented a better organisational structure. However, their relatively poor performance overall compared to Joint Local Agencies suggests that they underestimated the benefits of having the local public employment service merged with the local social benefit administration.
机译:德国联邦政府已允许某些地区的地方政府(经批准的当地医疗机构)对照顾失业救济金II受助人承担全部责任。在其余地区成立了联合地方机构,地方社会福利管理部门与地方公共就业服务机构一起工作。我们发现,尽管自我选择积极,但批准的本地服务提供商的表现并不比联合地方机构更好。更有趣的是,使用有关组织特征的唯一数据集,我们可以证明,主要由认可的本地提供者实施的组织特征与II号失业救济金获得者的求职概率呈正相关。因此,自选为“批准的本地提供商”的地方政府似乎已实施了更好的组织结构。但是,与联合地方机构相比,他们的整体绩效相对较差,这表明他们低估了将当地公共就业服务与地方社会福利管理部门合并的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号