首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk-Averse by Nation or by Religion? Some Insights on the Determinants of Individual Risk Attitudes
【2h】

Risk-Averse by Nation or by Religion? Some Insights on the Determinants of Individual Risk Attitudes

机译:国家或宗教的风险规避?关于个体风险态度决定因素的几点看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research findings have proven that the willingness to take risks is distributed heterogeneously among individuals. In the general public, there is a widely held notion that individuals of certain nationalities tend to hold certain typical risk preferences. Furthermore, religious beliefs are thought to explain differences in risk-preparedness on the individual level. We analyze these two possible determinants of individual risk attitudes: nationality and religion. First addressing the study of risk attitudes in a literature review, we then test our hypotheses empirically using the large, representative German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). To understand the importance of nationality, we focus on emigrants to Germany. The key findings are: (1) Nationality is not a valid determinant of risk attitudes. It can be broken down into several constituent factors including religion. (2) Religiousness is a significant determinant of risk attitudes. Religious persons are less risk-tolerant than atheists. Moreover, religious affiliation matters: Muslims are less risk-tolerant than Christians.
机译:研究结果证明,冒险意愿在个人之间是异质分布的。在公众中,有一种广泛持有的观念,即某些国籍的个人倾向于持有某些典型的风险偏好。此外,人们认为宗教信仰可以解释个体风险准备的差异。我们分析了个人风险态度的两个可能的决定因素:国籍和宗教信仰。首先在文献综述中讨论风险态度的研究,然后我们使用具有代表性的大型德国社会经济专家小组(SOEP)经验性地检验我们的假设。为了了解国籍的重要性,我们将重点放在移民德国上。主要发现是:(1)国籍不是风险态度的有效决定因素。它可以分为几个组成因素,包括宗教。 (2)宗教是风险态度的重要决定因素。宗教人士比无神论者更没有风险。此外,宗教信仰也很重要:穆斯林比基督徒对风险的容忍度要低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号