首页> 外文OA文献 >Do more trucks lead to more motor vehicle fatalities in European roads? Evaluating the impact of specific safety strategies
【2h】

Do more trucks lead to more motor vehicle fatalities in European roads? Evaluating the impact of specific safety strategies

机译:更多的卡车会导致欧洲道路上的机动车死亡人数增加吗?评估特定安全策略的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Truck operations have recently become an important focus of academic research not only because road freight transport is a key part of logistics, but because trucks are usually associated with negative externalities including pollution, congestion and traffic accidents. While the negative environmental impacts of truck activities have been extensively analyzed, comparatively little attention has been paid to the role of trucks in road accidents. A review of the literature identifies various truck-traffic safety related issues: frequency of accidents and their determinants; risk factors associated with truck driver behavior (including cell phone use, fatigue, alcohol and drugs consumption); truck characteristics and facilities (roadway types, specific lanes and electronic stability programs) to improve performance of vehicle maneuvering; and the safety characteristics of heavy and large trucks. However, to date, there seems to have been developed few studies evaluating the complex coexistence of trucks and cars on roads and that may support the implementation of differential road safety strategies applied to them. This paper focuses on the impact on the traffic fatalities rate of the interaction between trucks and cars on roads. We also assess the efficiency of two stricter road safety regulations for trucks, as yet not harmonized in the European Union; namely, speed limits and maximum blood alcohol concentration rates. For this, econometric models have been developed from a panel data set for European Union during the years 1999?2010. Our findings show that rising motorization rates for trucks lead to higher traffic fatalities, while rising motorization rates for cars do not. Furthermore, we also find that lower maximum speed limits for trucks are effective and maximum blood alcohol concentration rates for professional drivers are only effective when they are strictly set to zero. Therefore, our results point to that the differential treatment of trucks is not only adequate for mitigating an important source of congestion and pollution, but that the implementation of stricter road safety measures in European countries for the case of trucks also contributes significantly to reducing fatalities. In summary, and as a counterpoint to the negative impact of trucks on road traffic accidents, we conclude the effectiveness of efforts made in road safety policy (based on specific traffic regulations by vehicle type imposed by member States) to counteract the safety externalities of freight transportation in the European Union. In certain sense, our study might provide indirect support to public policies implemented at the macro European level to promote multimodal transport corridors. In this respect, there is an increasing focus at the European level on how freight transport can be moved from trucks on roads to more environmentally-sustainable modes, such as rail and ship.
机译:卡车操作近来已成为学术研究的重要重点,这不仅是因为公路货运是物流的关键部分,而且因为卡车通常会带来负面的外部影响,包括污染,交通拥堵和交通事故。尽管已经对卡车活动的负面环境影响进行了广泛的分析,但很少有人关注卡车在道路事故中的作用。文献综述确定了与卡车交通安全相关的各种问题:事故发生频率及其决定因素;与卡车司机行为相关的危险因素(包括使用手机,疲劳,饮酒和吸毒);卡车的特性和设施(道路类型,特定车道和电子稳定程序),以改善车辆操纵性能;以及重型和大型卡车的安全特性。然而,迄今为止,似乎很少有研究评估卡车和小汽车在道路上的复杂共存,这可能支持实施适用于它们的不同道路安全策略。本文着重研究道路上卡车与汽车之间的交互对交通事故死亡率的影响。我们还评估了针对卡车的两项更为严格的道路安全法规的效率,而这在欧盟尚未统一。即限速和最高血液酒精浓度。为此,从1999年至2010年期间的欧盟面板数据集开发了计量经济学模型。我们的发现表明,卡车的机动化率提高导致交通事故死亡人数增加,而汽车的机动化率却没有上升。此外,我们还发现降低卡车的最高速度限制是有效的,而专业驾驶员的最大血液酒精浓度比率只有在严格将其设置为零时才有效。因此,我们的研究结果表明,对卡车进行差别对待不仅足以缓解重要的拥堵和污染源,而且在欧洲国家对卡车实施更严格的道路安全措施也极大地减少了死亡人数。总而言之,作为对卡车对道路交通事故的不利影响的对策,我们得出结论:道路安全政策(根据会员国针对车辆类型制定的具体交通法规)在抵消货运安全外部性方面所做努力的有效性欧盟的运输。从某种意义上说,我们的研究可能会间接支持在欧洲宏观水平上实施的促进多式联运走廊的公共政策。在这方面,欧洲越来越关注如何将货运从公路上的卡车转移到更环保的方式(如铁路和轮船)上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号