首页> 外文OA文献 >Conceptualizing power in the context of climate change: A multi-theoretical perspective on structure, agency power relations
【2h】

Conceptualizing power in the context of climate change: A multi-theoretical perspective on structure, agency power relations

机译:在气候变化背景下概念化权力:关于结构,代理和权力关系的多理论视角

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The predominantly positivist approach in economics towards the object of study is not able to grasp power and domination in its complex interaction of agency and structure. Also in ecological economics and its critique to economic growth, there is a lack of conceptualizations that are sensible to questions of power. The work reveals such deficits and offers a comprehensive theory overview. This overview is then contextualized along the political-economic facets of climate change. The introductory chapter discusses fundamental aspects of power in the context of structure and agency. The common positivist approach in economics is complemented by a post-positivist approach in the following chapter. Critical realism serves as a philosophy of science to acknowledge and integrate structure and agency as forms of power. The third chapter provides an historical overview of selected theories of power. It depicts how the strategic and the episodic understanding of power by Machiavelli and Hobbes respectively, informed later power theories. Theorists such as Dahl, Bachrach & Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, Laclau & Mouffe, Giddens, Foucault and Clegg are discussed. The aim is to highlight the relevance for a multiplicity of power concepts in economic research. The following chapter puts in context their respective positions on human agency and social structures as the source of power. The fifth chapter initiates an outlook for potential power research on future global challenges. The powers that play a role in the quest for solutions on the issue of climate change are systematically separated in the multiple levels of agency, mechanisms and structure. This serves as an exemplary case to depict the complexity but relevance of power on objects of research in ecological economics.
机译:经济学中主要针对研究对象的实证主义方法在其代理与结构的复杂相互作用中无法掌握权力和统治。同样在生态经济学及其对经济增长的批评中,也缺乏对权力问题敏感的概念化。这项工作揭示了这种缺陷,并提供了全面的理论概述。然后,根据气候变化的政治经济方面对本概述进行了背景介绍。介绍性章节讨论了结构和代理背景下权力的基本方面。下一章中的后实证主义方法对经济学中的普通实证主义方法进行了补充。批判现实主义作为一种科学哲学,承认并整合了作为权力形式的结构和代理。第三章对选定的权力理论进行了历史概述。它描述了马基雅维利和霍布斯分别对权力的战略和情节理解如何为后来的权力理论提供了信息。讨论了Dahl,Bachrach和Baratz,Lukes,Gramsci,Laclau&Mouffe,Giddens,Foucault和Clegg等理论家。目的是强调经济研究中多种权力概念的相关性。下一章将它们各自作为人力资源的动力和社会结构的立场放在上下文中。第五章对未来全球挑战进行了潜在的功率研究展望。在寻求解决气候变化问题的过程中发挥作用的力量在机构,机制和结构的多个层次上系统地分开了。这是一个示例性案例,描述了生态经济学中权力与研究对象的复杂性和相关性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stuf6r Lorenz;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号