首页> 外文OA文献 >Debt Brakes in the German States: Governments' Rhetoric and Actions
【2h】

Debt Brakes in the German States: Governments' Rhetoric and Actions

机译:德国各国的债务制动:政府的修辞和行动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2009 a new law on German debt brakes was passed: state governments are not allowed to run structural deficits after 2020. Consolidation strategies initiated today influence if a state can comply with the debt brake in 2020. We describe to what extent government ideology predicts if state governments consolidate budgets and which fiscal adjustment path they choose. Attitudes towards budget consolidation, as expressed by politiciansu2019 words in the public debate, differed among parties. Anecdotal evidence and descriptive statistics indicate that leftwing governments ran on average higher structural deficits than rightwing governments between 2010 and 2014. Primary deficits, however, hardly differed under leftwing and rightwing governments. Revenues of federal taxes were much higher than expected and facilitated budget consolidation. Leftwing governments did not need to run deficits to design generous budgets. It is conceivable that parties confirmed their identity by using expressive rhetoric, but responded to shifts in public opinion after the financial crisis and pursued more sustainable fiscal policies when in office.
机译:2009年,通过了一部有关德国债务制动的新法律:不允许州政府在2020年后出现结构性赤字。今天启动的合并战略影响一个国家能否在2020年遵守债务制动。我们描述了政府意识形态在多大程度上预测了州政府合并预算以及他们选择的财政调整路径。政客在公开辩论中表达的对预算合并的态度在各方之间有所不同。轶事证据和描述性统计数据表明,2010年至2014年间,左翼政府的结构性赤字平均水平高于右翼政府。然而,左翼政府和右翼政府之间的基本赤字几乎没有差异。联邦税收收入远高于预期,并促进了预算合并。左翼政府无需为设计慷慨的预算而出现赤字。可以想象,当事方使用表达性的言论来确认自己的身份,但在金融危机之后回应了舆论的转变,并在任职时奉行了更具可持续性的财政政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号