首页> 外文OA文献 >United but (un-)equal: Human capital, probability of divorce and the marriage contract
【2h】

United but (un-)equal: Human capital, probability of divorce and the marriage contract

机译:团结但(非)平等:人力资本,离婚概率和婚约

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper studies how the risk of divorce affects the human capital decisions of a young couple. We consider a setting where complete specialization (one of the spouses uses up all the education resources) is optimal with no divorce risk. Symmetry in education (both spouses receive an equal amount of education) then acts like an insurance device in case of divorce particularly when the institutions do not compensate for differences in earnings. But, at the same time symmetry in education is less efficient than the extreme specialization. This is the basic tradeoff underlying our analysis. We show that the symmetric allocation will become more attractive as the probability of divorce increases, if risk aversion is high and/or labor supply elasticity is low. However, it is only a second-best solution as the insurance protection is achieved at the expense of an efficiency loss. Efficiency can be restored through suitably designed marriage contracts because they can provide the appropriate insurance against divorce to a couple who opts for specialization. Finally, we study how the (economic) use of marriage is affected by the possibility of divorce.
机译:本文研究了离婚风险如何影响一对年轻夫妇的人力资本决策。我们认为,在没有离婚风险的情况下,完全专业化(配偶之一用尽了所有教育资源)是最佳的设置。受教育的对称性(夫妻双方都接受同等的教育)然后在离婚的情况下就像保险装置一样,特别是在这些机构无法弥补收入差异的情况下。但是,与此同时,对称教育的效率要比极端专业化低。这是我们分析所依据的基本权衡。我们表明,如果风险厌恶情绪高和/或劳动力供给弹性低,对称分配将随着离婚概率的增加而变得更具吸引力。但是,这只是第二好的解决方案,因为以效率损失为代价实现了保险保护。通过适当设计的婚姻合同可以提高效率,因为它们可以为选择专业化的夫妇提供适当的离婚保险。最后,我们研究离婚的可能性如何影响婚姻的(经济)用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号