首页> 外文OA文献 >Second-best analysis of European energy policy: Is one bird in the hand worth two in the bush?
【2h】

Second-best analysis of European energy policy: Is one bird in the hand worth two in the bush?

机译:欧洲能源政策的第二个最佳分析:一只手中的一只鸟在灌木丛中值两个吗?

摘要

This paper studies policy instruments that correct insufficient learning-by-doing (LbD) and research and development (R&D) of renewable electricity technologies and insufficient investments in energy efficiency (EE) in the presence of carbon pricing. The theoretical model analysis shows how to re-adjust the first-best in second-best situations, in which one of the policy instruments is restricted. Calibrated to the European power sector, the first-best choice of all instruments reduces the climate policy cost by one third. Feed-in tariffs turn out to be good substitutes for LbD, but not for R&D or EE subsidies.
机译:本文研究了一些政策工具,这些政策工具可以纠正可再生电力技术的“边做边学”(LbD)和研发(R&D)不足以及在存在碳定价的情况下对能源效率(EE)的投资不足。理论模型分析显示了在其中一种政策工具受到限制的情况下,如何在第二最佳状态下重新调整第一最佳状态。根据欧洲电力部门的标准,所有仪器的最佳选择将气候政策成本降低了三分之一。上网电价实际上可以替代LbD,但不能替代R&D或EE补贴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号