首页> 外文OA文献 >Coordinating European Union environmental policy: Shifting from passive to active coordination
【2h】

Coordinating European Union environmental policy: Shifting from passive to active coordination

机译:协调欧盟环境政策:从被动转向主动协调

摘要

Environmental policy provides one of the oldest and most puzzling cases of policy coordination in the European Union (EU). The integration (or mainstreaming) of environmental objectives into non environmental policies such as agriculture, energy and transport, has a long history and commands high level political support among heads of state. However, the implementation of environmental policy integration (EPI) has not yet matched these ambitions. One of the main problems is that EPI has been seen as a macro problem of drafting sweeping statements and writing long term integration strategies. The need to embed EPI in micro policy processes i.e. the bottom-up formulation and implementation of EU policies in administrative settings has, however, mostly been ignored. This paper analyses the administrative coordination mechanisms at the micro-level within the Commission, the Netherlands and UK governments to gauge how fit they are to deliver on the EUs broader EPI objective. Using different theories of coordination, this paper concludes that all three have relied too heavily on setting long term coordination targets, without putting in place the administrative coordination (i.e. delivery) mechanisms. This paper concludes that the EUs macro approach (dubbed the Cardiff process) cannot perform effectively without the support of implementing actions at the micro level. At the same time, activities at the micro level need the political commitment expressed at the macro level. Moreover, environmental information needs to be transferred within and between the actors in a much more active manner so that environmental impacts can be designed out of policy proposals early on in the policy process. The conclusion of this study is that, in the face of greater interdependence between policies and the concomitant demand for greater policy coordination, passive coordination has had its day. But for many different reasons, the actors have not yet come to grips with what is required to implement active coordination.
机译:环境政策是欧盟(EU)中最古老,最令人困惑的政策协调案例之一。将环境目标纳入(或纳入主流)农业,能源和运输等非环境政策的历史由来已久,并获得了国家元首的高层政治支持。但是,环境政策整合(EPI)的实施尚未达到这些目标。主要问题之一是,EPI已被视为草拟详尽报表和编写长期集成策略的宏观问题。但是,将EPI嵌入微观政策流程的需要,即自下而上的制定和在行政环境中实施欧盟政策的需求,大多数人都忽略了。本文分析了欧盟委员会,荷兰和英国政府内部微观层面的行政协调机制,以衡量它们在实现欧盟更广泛的EPI目标方面的适应程度。本文使用不同的协调理论得出结论,这三个国家都过于依赖设定长期协调目标,而没有建立行政协调(即交付)机制。本文的结论是,如果没有微观层面实施行动的支持,欧盟的宏观方法(称为加的夫进程)将无法有效执行。同时,微观层面的活动需要在宏观层面表达的政治承诺。此外,需要以更加积极的方式在参与者之间和参与者之间传递环境信息,以便可以在政策制定过程的早期就根据政策建议设计环境影响。这项研究的结论是,面对政策之间更大的相互依赖性以及随之而来的对更大程度的政策协调的需求,被动协调已经开始。但是由于许多不同的原因,参与者尚未掌握实施积极协调所需的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号