首页> 外文OA文献 >Backtesting Value-at-Risk using Forecasts for Multiple Horizons, a Comment on the Forecast Rationality Tests of A.J. Patton and A. Timmermann
【2h】

Backtesting Value-at-Risk using Forecasts for Multiple Horizons, a Comment on the Forecast Rationality Tests of A.J. Patton and A. Timmermann

机译:利用多层次预测回溯测试风险价值,评估a.J.的预测合理性测试patton和a. Timmermann

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patton and Timmermann (2012, 'Forecast Rationality Tests Based on Multi-Horizon Bounds', Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30(1) 1-17) propose a set of useful tests for forecast rationality or optimality under squared error loss, including an easily implemented test based on a regression that only involves (long-horizon and short-horizon) forecasts and no observations on the target variable. We propose an extension, a simulation-based procedure that takes into account the presence of errors in parameter estimates. This procedure can also be applied in the field of 'backtesting' models for Value-at-Risk. Applications to simple AR and ARCH time series models show that its power in detecting certain misspecifications is larger than the power of well-known tests for correct Unconditional Coverage and Conditional Coverage.
机译:Patton和Timmermann(2012年,“基于多视角界线的预测合理性测试”,《商业与经济统计杂志》,第30(1)1-17页)提出了一组有用的测试,用于平方误差损失下的预测合理性或最优性,包括一种基于回归的简单易行的测试,该回归仅涉及(长期和短期)预测,而对目标变量没有任何观察。我们提出了一种扩展,一种基于模拟的过程,该过程考虑了参数估计中存在错误。此过程也可以应用于“风险价值”的“回测”模型领域。在简单的AR和ARCH时间序列模型上的应用表明,它在检测某些错误规格方面的能力要比众所周知的正确无条件覆盖率和有条件覆盖率测试的能力大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号