首页> 外文OA文献 >Does privatization hurt workers? Lessons from comprehensive manufacturing firm panel data in Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine
【2h】

Does privatization hurt workers? Lessons from comprehensive manufacturing firm panel data in Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine

机译:私有化会伤害工人吗?匈牙利,罗马尼亚,俄罗斯和乌克兰综合制造公司面板数据的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We estimate the effects of privatization on firm-level wages and employment in four transition economies. Applied to longitudinal data on manufacturing firms, our fixed effect and random trend models consistently fail to support workers' fears of job losses from privatization, and they never imply large negative effects on wages; only for domestic privatization in Hungary and Russia are small (3-5%) negative wage effects found. Privatization to foreign investors has positive estimated impacts on both employment and wages in all four countries. The negligible consequences of domestic privatization for workers result from effects on scale, productivity, and costs that are large but offsetting in Hungary and Romania, and from small effects of all types in Russia and Ukraine. The positive employment outcome under foreign ownership results from a substantial scale-expansion effect that dominates the productivity-improvement effect, and the positive wage outcome from a productivity effect that dominates the effect on costreduction.
机译:我们估计了私有化对四个转型经济体企业水平的工资和就业的影响。我们将固定效应和随机趋势模型应用于制造企业的纵向数据时,始终未能支持工人对私有化所致的工作损失的恐惧,并且它们绝不暗示会对工资产生较大的负面影响。仅对于匈牙利和俄罗斯的国内私有化,发现的工资负面影响很小(3-5%)。外国投资者私有化对这四个国家的就业和工资都有积极的估计影响。家庭私有化对工人的影响可以忽略不计,这是由于规模,生产率和成本的影响虽然很大,但在匈牙利和罗马尼亚却被抵消了,而在俄罗斯和乌克兰则是各种各样的小影响。外国所有制下的正就业结果来自于规模扩大效应(主要是生产力改善效应),而正工资结果来自于生产力效应(主导了成本降低效应)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号