首页> 外文OA文献 >Are unfair import laws unfair to developing countries: evidence from US antidumping actions 1990 - 2004
【2h】

Are unfair import laws unfair to developing countries: evidence from US antidumping actions 1990 - 2004

机译:不公平的进口法律对发展中国家是否不公平:美国1990 - 2004年反倾销行动的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper investigates the effects of U.S. AD actions on DCs. It first considers administrative actions by the U.S. Department of Commerce, which decides AD margins for countries. It then considers decision making by the U.S. International Trade Commission, which determines injury to domestic industry. The econometric results show that USDOC actions lead to significantly higher AD margins for NMEs (all DCs) than for MOEs. Among countries that suffer from U.S. AD actions DCs have a significantly higher ratio of dumped imports to total imports (relative dumped imports) compared with middle income countries. However, the results also show that relative dumped imports of high income countries are also greater than middle income countries.
机译:本文调查了美国AD行动对DC的影响。首先,它考虑了美国商务部的行政措施,由美国商务部确定各个国家/地区的广告保证金。然后,它考虑美国国际贸易委员会的决定,该决定确定对国内工业的损害。计量经济学结果表明,USDOC行为导致NME(所有DC)的AD利润率明显高于MOE。与中等收入国家相比,在遭受美国反倾销诉讼之害的国家中,特区的倾销进口与总进口(相对倾销进口)的比率明显更高。但是,结果还表明,高收入国家的相对倾销进口也大于中等收入国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号