首页> 外文OA文献 >Regional effects of universities and higher education: a knowledge overview of Swedish, Scandinavian and international experiences
【2h】

Regional effects of universities and higher education: a knowledge overview of Swedish, Scandinavian and international experiences

机译:大学和高等教育的区域效应:瑞典,斯堪的纳维亚和国际经验的知识概述

摘要

The growing role of knowledge as the base of the economy has meant growing expectations of universities all over the world to function as engines for regional growth. The independent role of universities is slowly being replaced by governmental policies for human capital formation, knowledge dispersion, innovation systems, triple helix, etc. One example is Swedenu2019s new University Act that added a third task to universitiesu2019 two traditional tasks, education and research, viz. cooperation with surrounding society. Theoretically, this change in policy is supported the hypothesis presented by Gibbons et al (1995) of an emerging Mode 2 of knowledge production. Based on Swedish, Scandinavian and international experience, this paper summarizes knowledge of regional effects of universities and higher education. One conclusion is that the u201cregiment effectu201d (Florax 1992) seems to be the most obvious regional effect of universities and that hopes for university-led innovative regional development have hitherto seldom been fulfilled. The paper also analyses the obstacles to more intimate cooperation between universities and surrounding society and knowledge production a la Mode 2. This analysis is performed by applying the concept of social capital. Two of the conclusions are that most regions do not have the capacity to absorb the output of the universities (Florida & Cohen 1999), and that the internal social capital of universities is not adapted to governmentsu2019 demands, nor are the relations between universities and other stakeholders in regions. Keywords: University policy, Regional effects, Mode 2, Social capital
机译:知识作为经济基础的作用越来越大,这意味着全世界对大学成为区域增长引擎的期望越来越高。大学的独立角色正逐渐被政府关于人力资本形成,知识分散,创新体系,三重螺旋等的政策所取代。一个例子是瑞典的新《大学法》,该法案为大学增加了第三项任务,两项传统任务,教育和研究,即与周围社会的合作。从理论上讲,这种政策上的变化支持了吉本斯等人(1995)提出的关于知识生产的新兴模式2的假设。基于瑞典,斯堪的纳维亚和国际的经验,本文总结了大学和高等教育对地区影响的知识。一个结论是,“大学效应”(Florax 1992)似乎是大学最明显的区域效应,而且迄今为止,对大学主导的创新性区域发展的希望很少实现。本文还分析了在模式2下大学与周围社会之间更紧密合作和知识生产的障碍。该分析是通过应用社会资本的概念进行的。有两个结论是,大多数地区没有能力吸收大学的产出(Florida&Cohen 1999),大学的内部社会资本没有适应政府的要求,大学之间的关系也没有以及其他地区的利益相关者。关键字:大学政策,区域效应,模式2,社会资本

著录项

  • 作者

    Westlund Hans;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号