首页> 外文OA文献 >Misinterpreting a failure to disconfirm as a confirmation: A recurrent misreading of significance tests
【2h】

Misinterpreting a failure to disconfirm as a confirmation: A recurrent misreading of significance tests

机译:错误解释未能确认为确认:重复误读重要性测试

摘要

When a significance test fails to disconfirm a hypothesis economist often interpret this as evidence that this hypothesis is valid. Six such examples are cited from recent journals. But this is a misinterpretation of what significance tests show. Presumably this misinterpretation is founded on the valid principle that every failure to disconfirm a hypothesis adds to its credibility. But that principle defines a failure to disconfirm in a way that differs sharply from the way that this phrase is used in the context of significance tests. Some ways of ameliorating this problem exist.
机译:当显着性检验未能证实假设时,经济学家通常将其解释为该假设有效的证据。最近的期刊引用了六个这样的例子。但这是对意义测试所显示内容的误解。据推测,这种误解是建立在有效的原则之上的,即每一次对假设的质疑都会增加其可信度。但是,该原则定义了一种无法以与显着性测试中使用此短语的方式截然不同的方式来进行歧义。存在一些缓解此问题的方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mayer Thomas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号