首页> 外文OA文献 >What drives bidder cash reserve effects in acquisitions: Agency conflicts or precautionary motive?
【2h】

What drives bidder cash reserve effects in acquisitions: Agency conflicts or precautionary motive?

机译:是什么推动了投标人对收购的现金储备效应:代理商冲突或预防性动机?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A cash-rich company is less likely to be a bidder during 1994-2008 in the US, contrasting the findings based on earlier sample period. This is mainly due to the companies with high residual market-to-book ratios (i.e. the residual of the actual market-to-book ratio regressed on measures of agency conflicts). Higher bidder excess cash reserve reduces bidder return at deal announcement. The negative announcement effect is stronger for bidders of lower asset-tangibility, but insensitive to the level of agency conflicts. Post acquisition, a cash-rich bidder spends more funds on debt reduction, capital expenditure, but less on further acquisitions. Moreover, a cash-rich bidder has better operating performance when its residual market-to-book ratio is high. Our evidence suggests bidder cash reserve effects are more consistent with the precautionary motive than the agency theory. High cash reserve, to a great extent, indicates growth and overvaluation rather than agency conflicts.
机译:在1994年至2008年期间,现金充裕的公司不太可能成为美国的竞标者,这与基于较早样本期的调查结果形成了对比。这主要是由于剩余市净率较高的公司(即实际的市净率的剩余因代理冲突的度量而回归)。更高的投标人剩余现金储备会减少投标人在交易公告时的回报。对于资产无形资产较低的竞标者,负面公告的影响更大,但对代理机构冲突的程度不敏感。收购后,现金充裕的竞标者将更多资金用于减少债务,资本支出,但减少用于进一步收购的资金。此外,现金充裕的竞标者的剩余市净率高时,其运营绩效会更高。我们的证据表明,与代理理论相比,投标人现金储备的影响与预防动机更为一致。高现金储备在很大程度上表明增长和高估,而不是机构冲突。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gao Ning;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号