首页> 外文OA文献 >Do Deductibles reduce Moral Hazard in the German Statutory Health Insurance? - Empirical Evidence
【2h】

Do Deductibles reduce Moral Hazard in the German Statutory Health Insurance? - Empirical Evidence

机译:Deductibles是否减少德国法定健康保险中的道德风险? - 经验证据

摘要

This paper estimates the effect of participating in the optional tariff "Premium Refund", an implicit optional deductible tariff, on different measures of medical demand. Specifically, it analyzes whether participating in the tariff can reduce ex-post moral hazard. Therefore, I use panel data from a German company health insurance fund covering the years 2008 to 2012. In order to remove potential selection bias of healthy individuals selecting into the tariff, I match the group of participants with the group of nonparticipants by socioeconomic characteristics and baseline medical characteristics, amongst others. In addition, I combine matching with regression to make results more robust. I find that participating in the premium refund tariff significantly reduces the probability of visiting a general practitioner by 6 percentage points. However, the probability of visiting a doctor because of a trivial disease such as a common cold is not reduced. I conclude that there is evidence that participation in the tariff reduces medical demand. It remains unclear, though, whether this is due to a reduction in moral hazard or whether it is driven through some other channel.
机译:本文估计了参加选择性收费“ Premium Refund”(一种暗含的选择性可扣除费率)对不同医疗需求量的影响。具体来说,它分析了加入关税是否可以减少事后道德风险。因此,我使用了德国公司健康保险基金提供的涵盖2008年至2012年的面板数据。为了消除健康个人选择费率的潜在选择偏见,我根据社会经济特征和非参与者将参与者群体和基线医学特征等。此外,我将匹配与回归相结合,以使结果更可靠。我发现,参加保费退款关税可将探访全科医生的可能性大大降低6个百分点。但是,由于琐碎疾病(例如普通感冒)而就医的可能性并未降低。我的结论是,有证据表明,参与关税降低了医疗需求。但是,目前尚不清楚这是否是由于降低了道德风险或是否通过其他渠道造成的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thuf6nnes Stefanie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号