首页> 外文OA文献 >Evolution of Asia's outward-looking economic policies: Some lessons from trade policy reviews
【2h】

Evolution of Asia's outward-looking economic policies: Some lessons from trade policy reviews

机译:亚洲外向型经济政策的演变:贸易政策审查的一些教训

摘要

This Working Paper contains some observations concerning the evolution of trade and trade-related policies in the Asia-Pacific region since the establishment in 1989 of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM), whose goal is to improve the transparency of these policies. It also draws some lessons from the Reviews undertaken. In particular, the Paper examines how reforms, either unilateral or in connection with bilateral, regional or multilateral trade agreements, can be greatly facilitated by transparency, including cost-benefit (C-B) analyses of policies and measures that take full account not just of the interests of domestic producers, but also those of other groups, including exporters and domestic consumers. While high quality transparency is not cheap, the costs of achieving it pale in comparison with the financial assistance involved and efficiency losses associated with such assistance. Trade Policy Reviews (TPRs) throw light not only on measures that appear to contravene WTO rules, although that is not their purpose; more importantly, they identify measures not seemingly covered by WTO rules, which can, nonetheless, have economic effects equivalent to measures that are subject to these rules. One of the main lessons from these TPRs is that impediments to economic development are largely homegrown. Consequently, unilateral structural reform, of which liberalization of both trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) has been an integral part, is of paramount importance. By fostering transparency, particularly evaluating the effectiveness of policies and measures in achieving their objectives and their overall impacts (intended or unintended) on the economy, the TPRM can be a catalyst for unilateral reform, including liberalization of trade and FDI. Although the latter has received added impetus from multilateral liberalization under the auspices of the GATT/WTO, the stalling of negotiations in connection with the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) should not preclude further unilateral liberalization. By contrast, the benefits of preferential trade agreements are far from obvious, notwithstanding their proliferation during the past decade throughout the Asia-Pacific region, where few governments have subjected these agreements to rigorous cost-benefit analysis.
机译:本工作文件包含有关自1989年建立贸易政策审查机制(TPRM)以来亚太地区贸易和与贸易有关的政策演变的一些看法,其目的是提高这些政策的透明度。它还从进行的审查中吸取了一些教训。尤其是,本文探讨了透明可以极大地促进单方面或与双边,区域或多边贸易协定有关的改革,包括对政策和措施进行成本效益分析,而这种分析不仅要充分考虑政策和措施。国内生产者的利益,也包括出口商和国内消费者在内的其他群体的利益。虽然高质量的透明度并不便宜,但与涉及的财政援助和与此类援助有关的效率损失相比,实现这一目标的成本却相形见pale。贸易政策审查(TPR)不仅着眼于似乎违反WTO规则的措施,尽管这不是其目的;更重要的是,它们确定了世贸组织规则似乎未涵盖的措施,尽管如此,这些措施可能产生的经济影响等同于受这些规则约束的措施。这些TPR的主要教训之一是,阻碍经济发展的主要因素是国内产生的。因此,最重要的是单方面的结构改革,其中包括贸易自由化和外国直接投资(FDI)的自由化。通过提高透明度,特别是评估政策和措施在实现其目标及其对经济的总体影响(有意或无意)方面的有效性,TPRM可以成为单方面改革的催化剂,包括贸易和外国直接投资的自由化。尽管后者在关贸总协定/世贸组织的主持下从多边自由化中获得了更多的推动力,但与多哈发展议程有关的谈判停滞不应该阻止进一步的单边自由化。相比之下,尽管优惠贸易协定的收益在过去十年中在整个亚太地区不断扩大,但在亚太地区,很少有政府对这些协定进行严格的成本效益分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    Daly Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号