首页> 外文OA文献 >New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers: A comment
【2h】

New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers: A comment

机译:新凯恩斯主义与旧凯恩斯主义政府支出乘数:评论

摘要

Cogan et al. (2009, 2010) claim that the stimulus package passed by the United States Congress in February 2009 had a multiplier far below one. However, the stimulusu2019 multiplier strongly depends on the assumed monetary policy response. Based on official statements from the Fed chairman, the economic outlook, past behavior of the FOMC, optimal policy considerations, and financial market expectations, we find that in February 2009 a period of monetary accommodation of three years would have been a reasonable prediction. This implies that an appropriate real time assessment of the stimulusu2019 effects would have been more optimistic than Cogan et al.u2019s.
机译:Cogan等。 (2009年,2010年)声称,美国国会在2009年2月通过的一揽子刺激方案的乘数远低于1。但是,刺激因素在很大程度上取决于假定的货币政策反应。根据美联储主席的官方声明,经济前景,联邦公开市场委员会过去的行为,最佳的政策考虑因素以及金融市场预期,我们发现2009年2月的三年货币宽松期是一个合理的预测。这意味着对刺激效果的适当实时评估要比Cogan等人更为乐观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号