首页> 外文OA文献 >Today's standards and yesterday's economics - two short occasional essays: Eliminating history from economic thought and Mark Blaug on the quantity theory
【2h】

Today's standards and yesterday's economics - two short occasional essays: Eliminating history from economic thought and Mark Blaug on the quantity theory

机译:今天的标准和昨天的经济学:两篇短暂的随笔文章:从经济思想中消除历史,马克·布鲁在数量理论上

摘要

[Eliminating history from economic thought] Formal analysis, in which maximizing agents use today's 'true' model of the economy to form expectation upon which they then base their behaviour, trivializes the role of the future in economic life and ignores the possibility that the past's models, which helped generate the data against which today's models are tested, differed from the latter. Such analysis denies that economics has a relevant history, and its current dominance explains the decline of the history of economic thought within the discipline. [Mark Blaug on the quantity theory: A skirmish on the border between science and politics in the history of economic thought] Mark Blaug brought his usual standards of historical awareness and respect for empirical content to bear when he wrote about the Quantity Theory of Money, but he hesitated to probe too deeply into the political and ideological elements of its history, perhaps leading him to underestimate their importance for the theory's evolution.
机译:[从经济思想中消除历史]形式化分析,在这种形式中,最大化的推动者使用当今的“真实”经济模型来形成期望,然后他们基于其行为,轻视了未来在经济生活中的作用,而忽略了过去的可能性。有助于生成用于测试当今模型的数据的模型不同于后者。这样的分析否认经济学具有相关的历史,其当前的主导地位解释了该学科内经济思想史的衰落。 [关于数量论的马克·布劳格:经济思想史上科学与政治之间的小冲突]马克·布劳格在撰写《货币的数量论》时,提出了他通常的历史意识和对经验内容的尊重,但是他犹豫了一下,无法深入探讨其历史上的政治和意识形态因素,也许导致他低估了它们对理论发展的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Laidler David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号