首页> 外文OA文献 >Party to inequality: Right party power and income inequality in affluent Western democracies
【2h】

Party to inequality: Right party power and income inequality in affluent Western democracies

机译:不平等的一方:富裕的西方民主国家的右翼政党权力和收入不平等

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Much social science suggests that income inequality is a product of economic and demographic factors and recent work highlights the influence of Leftist politics in affluent Western democracies. But, prior research has neglected rightist politics. We examine the impact of cumulative right party power on three measures of income inequality in an unbalanced panel of 16 affluent Western democracies from 1969 to 2000. We find that cumulative right party power significantly increases inequality with effects comparable to other established causes. Left party power has less influence than the right on the Gini coefficient and the 90/50 ratio but a larger influence on the 90/10 ratio. Union density is insignificant after controlling for right party power. Right party power partly channels through and partly combines with government expenditures to affect inequality. Temporal interactions show that right parties became more influential after 1989 while left parties became less effective. Supplementary analyses suggest that a component of right party power's effects occurs through labor market inequality prior to taxes and transfers. Sensitivity analyses reveal that the results are robust to a wide variety of alternative specifications and operationalizations and do not depend on the inclusion of the U.S. in the sample. Our results inform debates about the sources of inequality and related sociological theories regarding class, politics, the state and the economy.
机译:许多社会科学表明,收入不平等是经济和人口因素的产物,最近的工作强调了左翼政治对富裕的西方民主国家的影响。但是,先前的研究忽略了右派政治。在1969年至2000年由16个富裕的西方民主国家组成的不平衡小组中,我们考察了累积的权利方权力对三种收入不平等衡量指标的影响。我们发现,累积的权利方权力显着加剧了不平等,其影响可与其他既定原因相提并论。左翼政党权力对基尼系数和90/50比率的影响小于右翼政党,但对90/10比率的影响较大。控制了权利方权力后,工会密度微不足道。右翼政权的一部分通过政府开支,部分与政府开支相结合,以影响不平等。时间上的互动表明,右派在1989年以后变得更有影响力,而左派则没有那么有效。补充分析表明,在税收和转移之前,劳动力市场的不平等是右倾政权影响的一部分。敏感性分析表明,该结果对各种替代规范和可操作性均具有鲁棒性,并且不依赖于样本中是否包含美国。我们的研究结果为有关不平等的根源以及有关阶级,政治,国家和经济的相关社会学理论的辩论提供了信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brady David; Leicht Kevin T.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号