首页> 外文OA文献 >Institutional change and legitimacy via Urban elections? People's awareness of elections and participation in Urban neighbourhoods (Shequ)
【2h】

Institutional change and legitimacy via Urban elections? People's awareness of elections and participation in Urban neighbourhoods (Shequ)

机译:城市选举的制度变迁和合法性?人们对选举和参与城市社区(社区)的意识

摘要

This paper analyses institutional reforms and political participation, most notably indirect and direct elections of residential committees (RC), in China's urban neighbourhoods and communities (shequ). It shows that these elections at present are not meaningful to the majority of city dwellers as the RCs have little decision-making power and no revenues generated by a collective economy as in most of China's villages. RCs are primarily important to those weaker strata of society who depend on the state to be provided with social services and financial support - tasks that the RCs are forced to assume on behalf of higher government authorities. Nevertheless, the author finds that as limited the significance of - and knowledge about - RC elections in the daily lives of China's urban dwellers still are, they still have some influence on political awareness and participation. For instance, they make people voice more opinions in their shequ, which may be a good starting point for more direct interference in local political affairs soon to come. The paper emphasizes that RC elections have been introduced in order to enhance regime legitimacy but suggests that they may spur democratization by the rise of accountability as a conditioning factor of this legitimacy and by electoral 'habituation' as a transition to full democratic commitment. Whilst 'security first, participation second' seems to be the order of the day and the 'freedom of politics' is still more important than a concern for RC elections and shequ affairs, it remains to be seen if those elections may not soon trigger off a meaningful drive for political participation in China's cities.
机译:本文分析了体制改革和政治参与,特别是在中国城市社区和居民区(shequ)的居民委员会的间接和直接选举。这表明,目前的选举对大多数城市居民而言意义不大,因为RC像中国大多数村庄一样,没有决策权,也没有集体经济产生的收入。 RC对于那些依赖国家提供社会服务和财政支持的较弱的社会阶层来说非常重要-RC被迫代表上级政府当局承担这些任务。尽管如此,作者发现,尽管在中国城市居民的日常生活中,RC选举的意义仍然有限,但对政治意识和参与度仍有一定影响。例如,它们使人们在他们的社区中表达更多意见,这可能是很快将对当地政治事务进行更直接干预的良好起点。该文件强调指出,为了增强政权的合法性而引入了RC选举,但建议通过可能成为这种合法性的条件因素的问责制的兴起以及作为向全面民主承诺的过渡的选举“习惯化”,可以刺激民主化。尽管“安全第一,参与第二”似乎已经成为日常事务,并且“政治自由”比关注RC选举和民政事务仍然重要,但这些选举是否可能不会很快触发还需拭目以待推动中国城市政治参与的重要动力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Heberer Thomas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号