首页> 外文OA文献 >How Google and others upset competition analysis: disruptive innovation and European competition law
【2h】

How Google and others upset competition analysis: disruptive innovation and European competition law

机译:Google和其他人如何破坏竞争分析:颠覆性创新和欧洲竞争法

摘要

Because of the reliance on market analysis, current competition law may not be sufficiently fit for taking account of disruptive innovation which leads to the introduction of new products or services overthrowing existing markets. In the US, innovation has been given a more prominent place in competition analysis by way of recognizing the existence of 'innovation markets' and 'innovation competition' in, respectively, the 1995 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property and the 2010 US Merger Guidelines. Although a similar notion of 'competition in innovation' has been introduced in the EU in policy documents in the area of Article 101 TFEU, in merger review and abuse of dominance cases such a concept has not been applied yet. By giving insight into the way in which the different pillars of EU competition law deal with disruptive innovation, this paper aims to contribute to the debate on how competition policy could be more conducive towards innovation in dynamic industries.
机译:由于依赖市场分析,当前的竞争法可能不足以考虑破坏性创新,从而导致引入新产品或服务而推翻现有市场。在美国,通过在1995年《知识产权许可反托拉斯指南》和2010年《美国合并》中分别认识到“创新市场”和“创新竞争”的存在,创新在竞争分析中的地位更加突出。准则。尽管欧盟在《欧盟条约》第101条领域的政策文件中引入了类似的“创新竞争”概念,但在合并审查和滥用优势案件中,这一概念尚未得到应用。通过深入了解欧盟竞争法的不同支柱处理颠覆性创新的方式,本文旨在为关于竞争政策如何更有利于动态产业创新的辩论做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号