首页> 外文OA文献 >Do Firms sell forward for Strategic Reasons? An Application to the Wholesale Market for Natural Gas
【2h】

Do Firms sell forward for Strategic Reasons? An Application to the Wholesale Market for Natural Gas

机译:企业是否因战略原因而向前推进?天然气批发市场的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Building on a model of the interaction of risk-averse frms that compete in forward and spot markets, we develop an empirical strategy to test whether oligopolistic frms use forward contracts for strategic motives, for risk-hedging, or for both. An increase in the number of players weakens the incentives to sell forward for risk-hedging reasons.However, if strategic motives are also relevant, then an increase in the number of players strengthens the incentives to sell forward. This difference provides the analyst with a way to identify whether strategic considerations are important at motivating frms to sell forward. Using data from the Dutch wholesale market for natural gas where we observe the number of players, spot and forward sales, and churn rates, we find evidence that strategic reasons play an important role at explaining the observed firms' (inverse) hedge ratios. In addition, the data lend support to the existence of a learning effect by wholesalers.
机译:基于在远期和现货市场上竞争的规避风险的公司之间相互作用的模型,我们开发了一种经验策略,以测试寡头公司是否将远期合同用于战略动机,风险对冲或两者。参与者数量的增加由于风险对冲的原因而削弱了卖出股票的动机,但是,如果战略动机也很重要,那么参与者数量的增加会增强卖出股票的动机。这种差异为分析人员提供了一种方法,可以确定战略考虑因素是否对激励frms向前销售很重要。使用荷兰天然气批发市场的数据,我们观察了参与者的数量,即期和远期销售以及流失率,我们发现战略原因在解释所观察到的公司(反向)对冲比率方面起着重要作用。另外,数据支持批发商学习效果的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号