首页> 外文OA文献 >Give or take? Rewards vs. Charges for a Congested Bottleneck
【2h】

Give or take? Rewards vs. Charges for a Congested Bottleneck

机译:给或拿?对拥挤瓶颈的奖励与收费

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper analyzes the possibilities to relieve congestion using rewards instead of taxes, as well as combinations of rewards and taxes. The model considers a Vickrey-ADL model of bottleneck congestion with endogenous scheduling. With inelastic demand, a fine (time-varying) reward is equivalent to a fine toll, and to a continuum of combinations of time-varying tolls and rewards (including fine feebates). When demand is price sensitive, a reward becomes less attractive from the efficiency viewpoint, because it attracts additional users to the congested bottleneck. As a result, both the second-best optimal rate of participation in the scheme, and the relative efficiency that can be achieved with it, decreases when demand becomes more elastic. Our analytical and simulation results for coarse schemes suggest that a coarse reward is less effective than a coarse feebate, which is itself less effective than a coarse toll. The most efficient coarse system is the step toll, which is also allowed to be positive in the shoulder period.
机译:本文分析了使用奖励而不是税收以及奖励和税收的组合来缓解拥堵的可能性。该模型考虑具有内生调度的瓶颈拥塞的Vickrey-ADL模型。对于无弹性的需求,罚款(随时间变化)的奖励等同于罚款通行费​​,并且是随时间变化的通行费和奖励(包括罚款软禁)相结合的连续体。当需求对价格敏感时,从效率的角度来看,奖励变得不那么吸引人,因为它吸引了更多的用户来解决拥挤的瓶颈。结果,当需求变得更有弹性时,方案中次优的最优参与率以及可以实现的相对效率都会降低。我们对粗略方案的分析和仿真结果表明,粗略奖励的效果不如粗略的削弱,而其本身却不如粗略的通行费。最有效的粗略系统是阶梯通行费,在通行期间也可以使其为正。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号