首页> 外文OA文献 >The dynamics of inertia: Institutional persistence and institutional change in telecommunications and health care
【2h】

The dynamics of inertia: Institutional persistence and institutional change in telecommunications and health care

机译:惯性动力学:电信和医疗保健中的制度性持久性和制度变迁

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

There is a tendency in the new institutionalist literature to equate institutional inertia with stasis and 'no-change'. Using case studies from the international telecommunications regime and the German health care system, the paper tries to show that this equation is wrong. Inertia does not necessarily prevent institutional change. It can interfere with the replacement of old institutions, but it is compatible with other forms of institutional transformation. Inert structures can be patched up with new structures or transposed to new functions. The paper analyzes patching up and transposition as distinct modes of institutional change and assesses their potential for adapting institutional arrangements to new environmental conditions. It concludes that inertia should not be contrasted with institutional change per se because inertia allows for and may even be a prerequisite of change.
机译:在新的制度主义文献中,有一种趋势将制度惯性等同于停滞和“不变”。利用国际电信体系和德国医疗体系的案例研究,本文试图证明该方程式是错误的。惯性并不一定阻止制度的改变。它可以干扰旧机构的替换,但可以与其他形式的机构转型兼容。惰性结构可以用新结构修补或换位为新功能。本文分析了作为制度变迁的不同模式的修补和换位,并评估了其使制度安排适应新的环境条件的潜力。结论认为,惯性不应与制度变迁本身进行对比,因为惯性允许并且甚至可能是变革的先决条件。

著录项

  • 作者

    Genschel Philipp;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1995
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号