首页> 外文OA文献 >Incentives vs. selection in promotion tournaments: Can a designer kill two birds with one stone?
【2h】

Incentives vs. selection in promotion tournaments: Can a designer kill two birds with one stone?

机译:奖励与推广锦标赛的选择:设计师能否一举两得?

摘要

This paper studies the performance of promotion tournaments with heterogeneous participants in two dimensions: incentive provision and selection. Our theoretical analysis reveals a trade-off for the tournament designer between the two goals: While total effort is maximized if less heterogeneous participants compete against each other early in the tournament, letting more heterogeneous participants compete early increases the accuracy in selection. Experimental evidence supports our theoretical findings, indicating that the optimal design of promotion tournaments crucially depends on the objectives of the tournament designer. These findings have important implications for the optimal design of promotion tournaments in organizations.
机译:本文从两个方面研究了具有异类参与者的促销锦标赛的绩效:激励提供和选择。我们的理论分析显示了锦标赛设计者在这两个目标之间的权衡:如果在锦标赛早期较少异类参与者相互竞争,则总精力将最大化,而在早期异类参与者之间进行竞争则可以提高选择的准确性。实验证据支持了我们的理论发现,表明促销比赛的最佳设计关键取决于比赛设计者的目标。这些发现对于组织中促销锦标赛的最佳设计具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号