首页> 外文OA文献 >Real origins of the Great Depression: monopolistic competition, union power, and the American business cycle in the 1920s
【2h】

Real origins of the Great Depression: monopolistic competition, union power, and the American business cycle in the 1920s

机译:大萧条的真正起源:20世纪20年代的垄断竞争,工会权力和美国商业周期

摘要

Most treatments of the Great Depression have focused on its onset and its aftermath. In contrast, we take a unified view of the interwar period. We look at the slide into and the emergence from the 1920-21 recession and the roaring 1920s boom, as well as the slide into the Great Depression after 1929, and attempt to explain these phenomena in a unified framework. The model framework combines monopolistic product market competition with search frictions and bargaining in the labor market, allowing for both individual and collective (unionized) wage bargaining. We attribute the extraordinary macroeconomic and financial volatility of this period to two factors: Shifts in the wage bargaining regime and in the degree of monopoly power in the economy. The pro-union provisions of the Clayton Act of 1914 contributed to the slide in asset prices and the depression of 1920-21, while a series of tough anti-union Supreme Court decisions in late 1921 and 1922 coupled with the lax anti-trust enforcement of the Coolidge and Hoover administrations enabled a major rise in corporate profits and stock market valuations throughout the 1920s. Landmark court decisions in favor of trade unions in the late 1920s, as well as political pressure on firms to adopt the welfare capitalism model of high wages, made the economy increasingly susceptible to collapsing profit expectations. We model the onset of the great depression as an equilibrium switch from individual wage bargaining to (actual or mimicked) collective wage bargaining. The general equilibrium effects of this regime change are consistent with large decreases in output, employment, and stock prices.
机译:大萧条的大多数治疗方法都集中在其发作和后果上。相反,我们对两次战争之间的时期持统一看法。我们看一下1920-21年衰退和咆哮的1920年代繁荣的滑入和崛起,以及1929年之后进入大萧条的滑坡,并试图在一个统一的框架中解释这些现象。该模型框架将垄断产品市场竞争与劳动力市场中的搜索摩擦和讨价还价相结合,允许个人和集体(非工会化)工资讨价还价。我们认为这一时期的宏观经济和金融动荡是两个因素造成的:工资谈判制度的变化和经济中垄断力量的变化。 1914年《克莱顿法》的亲工会条款促成了资产价格的下跌和1920-21年代的萧条,而最高法院在1921年和1922年后期作出的一系列严厉的反工会裁决以及松懈的反托拉斯法执行在1920年代,柯立芝(Coolidge)和胡佛(Hoover)政权的成立大大提高了公司利润和股票市场的估值。具有里程碑意义的法院于1920年代后期作出的有利于工会的裁决,以及对公司采取高工资福利资本主义模型的政治压力,使经济越来越容易受到利润预期下降的影响。我们将大萧条的发生建模为从个人工资谈判到(实际或模仿的)集体工资谈判的均衡转变。这种体制变化的总体均衡效应与产出,就业和股票价格的大幅下降相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号