首页> 外文OA文献 >Vertical integration, separation and non-price discrimination: An empirical analysis of German electricity markets for residential customers
【2h】

Vertical integration, separation and non-price discrimination: An empirical analysis of German electricity markets for residential customers

机译:垂直整合,分离和非价格歧视:德国住宅用户电力市场的实证分析

摘要

The literature on vertical integration in markets with regulated upstream prices suggests that the integrated upstream firm might engage in non-price discrimination. Several studies provide policy recommendations derived either from case study approaches or based on theoretical modeling which addresses the unbundling issue. In this study we analyze the impact of vertical integration of retail incumbent and network operator on retail prices and upstream charges. As the vertical structure is heterogeneous across the 850 German electricity submarkets for residential customers (there exist legally unbundled, vertically integrated or fully separated firms), we use firm level data to analyze the effects of different vertical structures and regulation schemes on retail electricity prices. We find significantly higher prices in markets with vertically integrated firms compared to markets with fully separated firms. This finding could indicate non-price discrimination. Furthermore, we find no evidence that legal unbundling eliminates the incentives for non-price discrimination because the prices do not differ from prices in markets under vertical integration.
机译:关于上游价格受规制的市场中垂直一体化的文献表明,上游一体化企业可能会参与非价格歧视。多项研究提供了从案例研究方法或基于理论模型的政策建议,以解决捆绑问题。在这项研究中,我们分析了零售企业和网络运营商的垂直整合对零售价格和上游费用的影响。由于垂直结构在850个德国居民用电子市场上是异类的(存在合法的非捆绑,垂直整合或完全分离的公司),因此我们使用公司级数据来分析不同垂直结构和监管计划对零售电价的影响。我们发现,垂直整合公司的市场价格要比完全独立公司的市场高得多。这一发现可能表明非价格歧视。此外,我们发现没有证据表明法律捆绑消除了非价格歧视的诱因,因为价格与纵向一体化下的市场价格没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号