首页> 外文OA文献 >Crowding Out of Long-Term Care Insurance: Evidence from European Expectations Data
【2h】

Crowding Out of Long-Term Care Insurance: Evidence from European Expectations Data

机译:挤出长期护理保险:来自欧洲期望数据的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Long-term care (LTC) is the largest insurable risk that old-age individuals face in most western societies. However, the demand for LTC insurance is still ostensibly small in comparison to the financial risk, which is reflected in the formation of expectations of insurance coverage. One explanation that has received limited support is that expectations of either public sector funding' and family bailout' crowd out individual incentives to seek insurance. This paper aims to investigate further the above mentioned motivational crowding out hypothesis by developing a theoretical model and by drawing on empirical analysis of representative survey data of fifteen European countries containing records on individual expectations of LTC funding sources (including private insurance, social insurance and the family). The theoretical model shows that, when informal care is treated as exogenously determined, expectations of both state support and informal care can potentially crowd out LTC insurance expectations, while this is not necessarily the case when informal care is endogenous to insurance, as is the case when intra-family moral hazard is integrated in the insurance decision. Evidence from expectations data suggest evidence consistent with the presence of family crowding out, but no evidence of public sector crowding out, and only weak evidence for cohorts of individuals older than 55.
机译:长期护理(LTC)是大多数西方社会中老年人所面临的最大可保险风险。但是,与金融风险相比,LTC保险的需求在表面上仍然很小,这反映在对保险范围的预期形成中。得到有限支持的一种解释是,对公共部门资金和家庭救助的期望会挤出个人寻求保险的动机。本文旨在通过建立理论模型并利用对15个欧洲国家的代表性调查数据进行的实证分析来进一步研究上述动机排挤假设,该数据包含有关LTC资金来源(包括私人保险,社会保险和家庭)。理论模型表明,将非正式护理作为外生决定时,对国家支持和非正式护理的期望都可能会挤占LTC保险的期望,而当非正式护理是保险的内生因素时,情况不一定如此。将家庭内部道德风险纳入保险决策时。期望数据的证据表明,证据与家庭被排挤的情况相符,但没有证据表明公共部门排挤了,只有55岁以上人群的证据很少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号